Baker's Dozen GTG #1 1942-P Jefferson Nickel

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Lehigh96, Dec 8, 2020.

?

Guess the Assigned Grade

  1. AU58

  2. MS60-64

  3. MS65

  4. MS66

  5. MS67

  6. MS68

  7. Other (Please Explain in Comments)

  8. 5FS (Full Steps)

  9. Not FS

  10. + Designation

Multiple votes are allowed.
Results are only viewable after voting.
  1. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    This thread will be the first of 13 Jefferson Nickel GTG threads that I will post over the next three days. I will try to provide links to the successive threads so that everyone who responds to this thread will be notified. Each thread will start with the words "Baker's Dozen" as well so they can easily be found using the search function.

    Please GTG of the 1942-P Jefferson Nickel shown below. I have attached a poll for you to cast your vote and you may select up to 3 different things: the numerical grade, Full Steps or not, and the + designation.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    As always, comments welcome, and please remember to vote in the poll.
     
    ddddd and RonSanderson like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. CamaroDMD

    CamaroDMD [Insert Clever Title]

    I'm going MS65 on this one, no FS. I think you lose the FS under the third pillar. I would call this 5-5-4-5.

    Overall it's a really clean coin and it looks nice...not much in the way of hits. But something is going on next to Trust on the obverse and it is very distracting to the eye appeal and IMHO limits the grade to a 65. If it wasn't for that, I would say 66 all day long.
     
  4. furham

    furham Good Ole Boy

    66FS. Keep them coming.
     
  5. Dave Waterstraat

    Dave Waterstraat dave700x -1883 O nut

  6. brokrken

    brokrken Active Member

    I'm at 65 and would give it FS. Although it looks like it's in an NGC holder, so maybe not. It's hard to tell what that is next to the T in trust, but I don't think it warrants a "damaged" label. I do think it keeps it from 66. It might actually make 67 without that mark. Really great luster on this one.
     
  7. kSigSteve

    kSigSteve Active Member

    66 no FS. Agree that the steps appear to be bridged under column 3.

    The mark next to trust looks like a strike through or a lamination that is peeling but still connected at the south end. I think if it was PMD you would not have sent this in for grading. I don’t think strike through or lamination is penalized in the grade which is why I went with 66.
     
    Last edited: Dec 8, 2020
  8. ddoomm1

    ddoomm1 keep on running

    Does Jefferson have a horn?

    MS-66 FS
     
  9. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    I said MS-65, not FS.
     
  10. CircCam

    CircCam Victory

  11. Travlntiques

    Travlntiques Well-Known Member

    Great idea for a GTG, Lehigh96!
    My vote is cast....looks like I'm in good company :)
     
  12. Springford CC

    Springford CC Member

    I voted MS67 FS, but it’s not FS in NGC. Expecting a crack and cross to PCGS.
     
  13. stldanceartist

    stldanceartist Minister of Silly Walks Supporter

    I went with 67 (no FS) as I only really saw a couple minor hits on the obverse (was on the fence about giving it a 66+) and I felt the white prongs meant it was an NGC slab (so they'd be tougher on the FS than PCGS, in my experience.)
     
    Lehigh96 likes this.
  14. Razz

    Razz Critical Thinker

  15. Santinidollar

    Santinidollar Supporter! Supporter

  16. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    MS 67 not fs ...very clean and lustrous...steps have breaks which prevent the designation
     
    Anthony Mazza likes this.
  17. Anthony Mazza

    Anthony Mazza Active Member

  18. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

  19. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

  20. Mainebill

    Mainebill Wild Bill

    66 and just misses fs
     
  21. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page