Reply to Thread

Message:: [QUOTE="mrbrklyn, post: 1413678, member: 4381"]<blockquote> Though I might be flattered that you made 9 posts about me, lets summarize this litany of posts (remembering that you say you post facts not opinions)</blockquote> <blockquote>Oh God – Two days off for Passover and this is what I have to look forward to coming back to.  Do you do this too everyone on cointalk, or just those of us who actually can lay down the documentation that you refuse to read.</blockquote>  <blockquote>You should know that everyone is intimidated by your fluster and distortions.</blockquote> <blockquote>The reason for posting 9 messages was to underline how many times you’ve been overtly dishonest in this thread, specifically and especially when you misrepresent what I said, which is despicably dishonest, and then make claims like you read the some 500+ pages of technical information that was provided to you that proves, with annotation, and without a doubt, that your fundamentally wrong about Money, which you insist has to be gold, Taxes, that you insist can’t be collected as income taxes if we use gold instead of real money, and that the guy who is writing and annotating those works, according to you, is  a “physics teacher” although he IS really a rocket scientist and responsible, literally, for the engineering feat of putting man on the moon.</blockquote>  <blockquote>Here is the real question.  You do believe that we put man on the moon, right? </blockquote>  <blockquote>Now here is the best part of this response by you and an example of why this thread has been going on for THREE MONTHS.  You believe that it is effective conversation and fair debate for you to set yourself up as judge and jury over the validity of any information that is passed to you, as to if it is truth, or “opinion”.  </blockquote> <blockquote>Now that is how it might work in Fatima world, but in the real world, we depend of something called “peer review”, documentation, and verifiable fact. </blockquote>  <blockquote>You refuse to take from anyone support for information, and then you called  peer review and verifiable information with annotation as </blockquote> <blockquote>“ If you can't speak for yourself and instead can only copy and paste what someone else says, then not only do you not have any credibility, but you now also have to defend that of whatever site you googled up. “ </blockquote>  <blockquote>Truthfully, that is mind numbing.  So far, conversations with you go like this.  </blockquote> <blockquote> </blockquote> <blockquote>Ruben:  Hey – the world is actually round.</blockquote> <blockquote>Fatima:  No – that is your opinion, not a fact.</blockquote> <blockquote> </blockquote> <blockquote>Oh – No – that is a fact and here is a photograph from NASA that proves it:</blockquote> <blockquote>  <a href="http://science.nasa.gov/media/medialibrary/2009/07/17/17jul_discoveringearth_resources/bluemarble_apollo17_big.jpg" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://science.nasa.gov/media/medialibrary/2009/07/17/17jul_discoveringearth_resources/bluemarble_apollo17_big.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://science.nasa.gov/media/medialibrary/2009/07/17/17jul_discoveringearth_resources/bluemarble_apollo17_big.jpg</a></blockquote> <blockquote> </blockquote> <blockquote> </blockquote><a href="http://science.nasa.gov/media/medialibrary/2009/07/17/17jul_discoveringearth_resources/earthrise.jpg" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://science.nasa.gov/media/medialibrary/2009/07/17/17jul_discoveringearth_resources/earthrise.jpg" rel="nofollow"><img src="http://science.nasa.gov/media/medialibrary/2009/07/17/17jul_discoveringearth_resources/earthrise_strip.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></a> <blockquote> </blockquote> <blockquote> Fatima: " Hopefully, however, I've laid out enough actually sources " <-- Opinion </blockquote> <blockquote> </blockquote> <blockquote> Like Kojak used to say “Fatima, Who loves you baby!!”  Guys like you come and go, but I’ve been on this beat for almost a decade now  So take some advise, clean up your act and play fair and square or there will be no tootsie roll pops for you! </blockquote> <ol> <li><blockquote>What         you posted is that you read the link and understood it.<--         Opinion</blockquote>                   <blockquote>Ah         – how nice of you too suffer my “opinion” that you didn’t         read the hundreds of pages of annotated research that was resented         to you, like you said you did, and then called the researcher a         “physics teacher”, which BTW by its self  likely far more         professional of a professional then you display, even though you         mean it as a put down, and then misquote him.</blockquote>                   <blockquote>Yes         – that usually causes most education people to believe your a         lier.</blockquote> </li> <li><blockquote>Evidently,         you failed to do either.BTW - that is another misrepresentation         which completely underscores your questionable character. Nobody         here, Fatima, is going to buy into this. <--         Opinion</blockquote>                   <blockquote>That         is right.  I’m calling you on it.  You didn’t bother to read         it, and you didn’t understand it, and then you lied about it.  My         16 year old has betters manners.</blockquote> </li> <li><blockquote>I         believe this was the first misrepresentation that was made. ...         sigh <-- Opinion</blockquote>          <blockquote>         Since you didn’t adequately quote         anything here, who knows what your talking about.  can’t you even         quote correctly if your going to tell me that factual events are my         “opinion”.</blockquote> </li> <li><blockquote>(copy         & pasted someone elses website and stated that because you         can't read it fast then nobody can)<--         Opinion</blockquote>                   <blockquote>Peer         reviewed annotationed information, baby.  Get used to see it         because I tend to through it around a lot when people say stupid         things and then bully others.</blockquote> </li> <li><blockquote>I         posted this just to give everyone an idea of HOW obsurd it is that         you claim to have read this and understand it. <--         Opinion</blockquote>          <blockquote>What’s         wrong Fatima?  Its my opinion that I posted it because I felt is         was necessary for folks to see how you lied in this thread?          Because, yeah, that is my opinion because, strangley enough, I         actually remember posting it.</blockquote> </li> <li><blockquote>Just         to underscore it again, incase you missed the point<--         Opinion</blockquote>                   <blockquote>Is         this the same opinion as the last one or a new one that your making         up?          </blockquote> </li> <li><blockquote>Hopefully,         however, I've laid out enough actually sources that someone truly         interested in the issue can actually read some comprehensive         information on the ABC's of how monetary policy and money actually         works, instead of hearsay and conjecture.<--         Opinion          </blockquote>          <blockquote>Ah         – you got me.  It is MY opinion that I hopefully posted enough         peer reviewed, annotated documentation to educate someone.  See,         Fatima, that is how we do it in the real world.</blockquote> </li> <li><blockquote>(copy         & pasted a website without any context)<--         PMS?          </blockquote> </li> <li><blockquote>"The tremendous         problem we face is that we are becoming sharecroppers to our own         cultural heritage .....<-- Opinion"</blockquote>          <blockquote>That         is right.  That is my opinion and has nothing to do with this         thread, but with laws like SOPA and the DMCA.  You’ll have to         start another thread if you want to talk about this.          </blockquote> </li> </ol>     <blockquote>You     have proved my point exactly. As I said earlier the only two things     you have stated in this topic relative to this topic are that      </blockquote> <ol> <li><blockquote>You         state that government taxation can affect the worth of the currency         of its central bank.          </blockquote> </li> </ol>     <blockquote>     No, Babe, I said that if government wants to increase the value     of the dollar on world markets all it needs to do is increase taxes     and remove the dollars from the market  I then ANNOTATED this and     sent you a huge link on money and finance that you refused to read,     and then you lied to us that you did read the link.  BTW – Cloudsweeper, who is     someone I NEVER agree with, told you exactly the same thing, despite     that he supports the gold standard because this is FUNDEMENTAL to     understanding real money. </blockquote> <ol> <li><blockquote>You believe gold &         silver are useless for money          </blockquote>          <blockquote>Yeah – show me that?          That is a typical perversion of someone elses words, something you         constantly do here. </blockquote> </li> </ol>     <blockquote>Without     proof you are stating opinions, and the weblink from the physics     teacher disagrees with you. I disagree with you on point #1 as well.     You are entitled to your opinion about gold & silver but it     makes one wonder why you are posting in a gold & silver bullion     forum except to troll.      </blockquote>     <blockquote>I     will post wherever I want to, and it is none of your business where     and when I post. </blockquote>          <blockquote>Nothing     in those 9, posts changes this.      </blockquote>          <blockquote>What     is THIS?  Do you even understand the topic of conversation at this     point, or are you just trolling?</blockquote>     <blockquote>In     fact it's the type of thing that people do who can't defend their     points. Some advice.      </blockquote>     <blockquote>     You’re giving advise?  You haven’t even yet figured out how     to evaluate a peer reviewed and annotated resource and your giving     ME advise.  Let me give you advice.  DON’T LIE.  I love yah Babe.      But your like a junkie on junk.  You just can’t stop, but I     believe that you have the power to change.</blockquote>     <blockquote>If you     can't speak for yourself and instead can only copy and paste what     someone else says, then not only do you not have any credibility,     but you now also have to defend that of whatever site you googled     up. Try working on a basic education about currency and bullion and     you won't be left with having to cut and past stuff from physics     teachers on the internet. Out of respect for the others on     this forum I won't respond to you again unless you have an actual     point relative to the OP.      </blockquote>          <blockquote>You     can’t respect someone else until you respect yourself first.</blockquote>[/QUOTE]

Create my FREE Account!

Log in or Sign up

Reply to Thread

Useful Searches