Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;FishyOne, post: 1013353, member: 27384&quot;]<p style="text-align: left"><span style="color: #000000">I believe a lot of the ugliness in this thread is that some people consider a VF coin &#039;worn&#039; while others of us consider VF too nice a coin to have in our junk Barbers or Mercs.</span></p> <p style="text-align: left"><span style="color: #000000"><br /></span></p> <p style="text-align: left"><span style="color: #000000">Read more: <a href="http://www.cointalk.com/t133717-3/#ixzz12BrVJ9Gb" class="internalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.cointalk.com/t133717-3/#ixzz12BrVJ9Gb">http://www.cointalk.com/t133717-3/#ixzz12BrVJ9Gb</a></span></p><p><br /></p><p>That&#039;s a good point and I&#039;m not trying to be ugly.&nbsp; : )&nbsp; VF and above there&#039;s little or no weight loss from mint specified tolerances.&nbsp; Below Fine and it&#039;s a different story.&nbsp; Some buyers, me included, will not buy &quot;slicks&quot; in PO1 or FR2 condition for this reason.&nbsp; Now a full $1,000 bag is never going to be all slicks unless someone took the time to make it that way.&nbsp; The .715 multiplier backs out 1.5% weight for wear, which is okay as long the coins average VG or better (and they usually will).[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in