Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;medoraman, post: 1241497, member: 26302&quot;]I agree with physical PM as well. Most things I prefer paper assets, but lets face it, in the history of PM there has been a lot of shenanigans with PM &quot;companies&quot; holding your PM. I would always prefer to have my PM position in a SDB or a good home safe.</p><p><br /></p><p>Fatima is right that silver was &quot;frothy&quot;, (my words), and gold was overlooked. I would humbly point out that right now gold may be a touch high, but agree long term it will remain a good store of value. The major problem with buying any PM is simply the acquisition costs/selling costs. They are much higher than most investments, further reiterating the need to hold these assets long term to minimize this cost.</p><p><br /></p><p>I also agree with what Fatima has said for quite a while, that gold is a major play, meaning it has so much inventory and held by such strong hands its not easily manipulatable. Silver is a thinner market so much more volatile. Volatility is great when its going your way, though. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> I still say a blend of PM is probably the best way to go long term. Its just like stocks, you can have the right industry but the wrong stock. I wish I would have bought more palladium under $100 an ounce. </p><p><br /></p><p>Chris[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in