Silver on its way to $80 an ounce

OK my bad.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

how good is your aim when running from vampires?

 

Nue?

 

Most in this neighborhood have several.

 

Who's to say. When you think about it, it seems to be the most sensible thread in this section for many years.

 

Why would I be shooting at a vampire?

Besides, I have an autoimmune disorder. If the Red Cross won't take my blood, what makes you think a vampire would want it?

 

sorry On a lighter note though, it sounds like you are your own worse enemy.

Also, if it is autoimmune, it won't bother vampires, unless you are one....and that would explain a lot.

 

I think he's referring to the phenomenon that if one were to sell gold at the NY open and buy back at the close every day over the last decade they would be richer than any single stock or commodity could have made them.

 

So would your broker.

that is mathematically meaningless

 

I don't even know what you're trying to say here. Did you forget what the topic is of this thread that you started? I don't think you're in any position to critize something as meaningless.

 

I understand. Buy at night and selling in the morning is a subset of a general upward trend. If the trend was down, it would also be down, and therefor I said that buying at night and selling in the morning is mathematically useless (you however are indispensable). As for this being off topic, sorry, you are 100% correct.

 

Really? Is there something that shows this? If there is a link I would like to see it. Also, is it just the past decade or longer?

 

The trend since 436 BC is not good as one sheckel of silver was only a sheckel then.

 

You only have to look at spot gold for the last 24 hours to see this. It's quite glaring today.

 

But for the two days previous, you would have lost money...

 

Inflexion stated its proven this action would make you wealthier than any stock or commodity during the same period. I simply asked for proof of that. Also, I would hope they accounted for the brokerage fees and potential dividends from stocks in that analysis.

Ruben also had a great point about a generally rising market in this time frame. I would also be interested if the same were true of the 10 years before this period as well.

I am asking since implying X is "proving" market manipulation should be examined and not taken as proven fact.

 

Sin Curves are a function of a circle.

 

Some charts may differ a little , especially in representation of the data on the x,y ( time, price), but leave off the z ( volume) entirely. The volume during the asian and european markets for silver for instance last night averaged less than 50 contracts per hour with an outlier of 257 contracts at 7AM East. Only when premarket opened did the large drops happen, with contracts averaging over 250 per minute ( not hr as before) and most were selling contracts, but the market recoverd in silver before the retail open at 9:30 East. , but is headed back down again, so the big sellers onthe pre-market seemed to have gauged the market correctly. IMO.

Jim

 

No doubt as this is obvious. However the statement wasn't concerned with individual days. I only mentioned it as an example of how the classic curve looks. If you want to know more, there are plenty of internet web pages devoted to the topic.

 

Not today it isn't...