Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;fatima, post: 1386119, member: 22143&quot;]You are correct.&nbsp; I should have said that it was the first notification day for delivery.&nbsp; People still holding contracts either be expected to deliver PM to the warehouse by the date you gave, or deposit money for delivery.&nbsp; Anyone with leased silver has a problem now.&nbsp; This is why they wacked the Comex so people could get out of it before it was too late. </p><p><br /></p><p>On Bernanke, as head of the central bank, that is leasing the PMs to the banksters with the intent to fuel a raid, then his timing was perfect.&nbsp; Why not choose this time when the head of the Federal Reserve is scheduled to speak on how well the economy is doing?&nbsp; If they knock down PMs then it can be claimed that the Federal Reserve&#039;s reassuring words has restored &quot;confidence&quot; in the economy.&nbsp; It seems to have fooled more than one person it seems.&nbsp;&nbsp; These attacks are well coordinated for maximum effect.&nbsp;&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>If one understand&#039;s QE, and I&#039;ve spelled out here before how it actually works, then it wouldn&#039;t be hard to see why there was no forthcoming QE at this time.&nbsp; It would cause another surge in oil and the powers that are don&#039;t want this right now.&nbsp;&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>I respect your right to believe what you want no matter what the eyes may say.&nbsp;&nbsp; I present the information here for those who might wish to consider it.&nbsp; As of 12 hours ago, the forum was full of posts about $50 silver again, it can never go down, etc etc etc.&nbsp;&nbsp; I was one of the very few, by starting this topic, that said, not so fast.&nbsp;&nbsp; It took just 8 days for it to happen.&nbsp;&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>In regards to my personal situation, (why does this forum persist on making things personal), I&#039;ve never said what my income might be.&nbsp; It&#039;s irrelevant to the argument made.&nbsp;&nbsp; I&#039;ve said before that a logical argument is not based on the characteristics of the individual making it.&nbsp; It should be about the message and not the messenger.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in