Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Bullion Investing
>
Ron Paul suggests the outright use of gold and silver could break the Fed
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="jspankster, post: 1993526, member: 72331"]We seem to forget that prior to and during the first several years after the creation of the Federal Reserve in 1913, there were several different types of "currency" in circulation. Research old paper money and you will find that we had "National Currency" backed by US bonds, Silver Certificates backed by silver, Gold Certificates backed by gold, and Federal Reserve Notes, which at that time were redeemable in "lawful" money at most Fed banks or the Treasury. Interestingly, "lawful money" was exactly that, silver or gold coin. These laws are still on the books and stem from provisions in the US Constitution. None of which were ever repealed and therefore remain the "Supreme Law of the Land." </p><p><br /></p><p>Over time, however, the Federal Reserve System took over (monopolized) our "currency" by eliminating competing currencies. At the same time Congress passed "legal tender" laws that forced us to use and accept the fiat currency in place of Constitutional currency backed by silver and gold. Next they removed us from the Gold standard and finally by eliminating all trace of silver from our coinage and backing of paper "notes." </p><p><br /></p><p>Another interesting topic to research is the legal definitions of "notes" as in Federal Reserve Notes. The word "note" actually means a "debt obligation." This is what fiat currency is, a debt obligation. Unlike gold and silver, which must be mined, extracted and then turned into "coinage", paper money is no longer backed by anything of value and is thus referred to as "fiat". There actually is a cost to print the stuff and the banking cartel, the Federal Reserve System, then "lends" it to our government at interest. This is why we have a national debt. Before 1913, very little debt. As the Fed grew stronger and eliminated currency competition, our National debt grew, at first slowly and steadily to now reaching exponential growth ratios in regards to the printing of Federal Reserve Notes. In other words, the more Federal Reserve Notes our government borrows from the Fed, the larger our National debt grows. No surprise either that within the same year, same months and just days apart, Congress passed the Federal Income Tax Act. The Fed needed some mechanism to ensure we the people would pay the interest on their money.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="jspankster, post: 1993526, member: 72331"]We seem to forget that prior to and during the first several years after the creation of the Federal Reserve in 1913, there were several different types of "currency" in circulation. Research old paper money and you will find that we had "National Currency" backed by US bonds, Silver Certificates backed by silver, Gold Certificates backed by gold, and Federal Reserve Notes, which at that time were redeemable in "lawful" money at most Fed banks or the Treasury. Interestingly, "lawful money" was exactly that, silver or gold coin. These laws are still on the books and stem from provisions in the US Constitution. None of which were ever repealed and therefore remain the "Supreme Law of the Land." Over time, however, the Federal Reserve System took over (monopolized) our "currency" by eliminating competing currencies. At the same time Congress passed "legal tender" laws that forced us to use and accept the fiat currency in place of Constitutional currency backed by silver and gold. Next they removed us from the Gold standard and finally by eliminating all trace of silver from our coinage and backing of paper "notes." Another interesting topic to research is the legal definitions of "notes" as in Federal Reserve Notes. The word "note" actually means a "debt obligation." This is what fiat currency is, a debt obligation. Unlike gold and silver, which must be mined, extracted and then turned into "coinage", paper money is no longer backed by anything of value and is thus referred to as "fiat". There actually is a cost to print the stuff and the banking cartel, the Federal Reserve System, then "lends" it to our government at interest. This is why we have a national debt. Before 1913, very little debt. As the Fed grew stronger and eliminated currency competition, our National debt grew, at first slowly and steadily to now reaching exponential growth ratios in regards to the printing of Federal Reserve Notes. In other words, the more Federal Reserve Notes our government borrows from the Fed, the larger our National debt grows. No surprise either that within the same year, same months and just days apart, Congress passed the Federal Income Tax Act. The Fed needed some mechanism to ensure we the people would pay the interest on their money.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Bullion Investing
>
Ron Paul suggests the outright use of gold and silver could break the Fed
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...