Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;krispy, post: 1118683, member: 19065&quot;]The thing is we were not arguing &quot;the idea that something is just plain&nbsp; over-done and arguably unreasonable.&quot; Your unsupported comment, &quot;You&nbsp; can&#039;t digitize a 1099, trust me, we would if we could.&quot; had no basis to&nbsp; overturn the prior suggestion that a simplified digital system could be&nbsp; implemented to ease the process. </p><p><br /></p><p>Those bemoaning the ideas of piles of paperwork could save themselves&nbsp; the free space in their &quot;imaginations&quot; worrying over truck loads of&nbsp; paper headaches and waste. They are just seeking negative and extreme&nbsp; examples of what may never come to be to find faults for the potential coming 1099 reporting rule.</p><p><br /></p><p>As I said, new systems to handle new forms of reporting will come on&nbsp; line. My layman&#039;s example, Turbo Tax replaces even having to seek, let&nbsp; alone know what an actual income tax reporting form looks like to get&nbsp; the job done. No trips to the post office for forms or stamps to mail&nbsp; off your payment. </p><p><br /></p><p>I&#039;m not saying each individual business owner has to pony up and become a&nbsp; spread sheet programmer to write software they need to track&nbsp; transactions. I&#039;m suggesting that there are tools that will be developed&nbsp; if a need arises. App developers are one such plausible group that&nbsp; might tackle this. </p><p><br /></p><p>People tend to make comments without support/reasoning for such&nbsp; utterances, not so much as to discuss the point at hand, but to continue&nbsp; finding reasons to twist the topic back to a form of complaint&nbsp; regarding their feelings against the proposed 1099 rule coming into&nbsp; effect.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in