Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Bullion Investing
>
Regarding the Future of the Bullion Section
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="imrich, post: 940821, member: 22331"]<b>Just The FACTS, Folks, Just The Facts!!</b></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><font size="7"><b>AMEN!! <font size="3">Recent posts, where it appears that the discussion disintegrates from general acceptance of "arguments" on a specific topic to applying political "labels" when individuals present opposing pro/con arguments, is in my opinion, reasonable justification for specific general "rules", and a singular implementation moderator. As a long standing organizer/Captain of a monthly debate system which pre-selects a debate subject for the following month, and then determines at the following monthly meeting, by the flip of a coin, who will argue pro or con, I find it very offensive when someone applies a political "label" to an individual that can present pro or con arguments to a subject. I'm the "devils' advocate" for virtually any subject, have advocated and won an odd number of objective judges for our debates, which has avoided stalemates. I believe that generally defined rules, and a singular moderator are necessary for some topics. Just my opinion folks, but it's like a**h****, every one seems to have one that may often spew excrement, </font></b></font><font size="7"><b><font size="3">found unacceptable to some. I again vote "C", as it appears that some subjects generate civil degradation of discussion.</font></b></font></p><p><font size="7"><b><font size="3"></font></b></font>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="imrich, post: 940821, member: 22331"][b]Just The FACTS, Folks, Just The Facts!![/b] [SIZE=7][B]AMEN!! [SIZE=3]Recent posts, where it appears that the discussion disintegrates from general acceptance of "arguments" on a specific topic to applying political "labels" when individuals present opposing pro/con arguments, is in my opinion, reasonable justification for specific general "rules", and a singular implementation moderator. As a long standing organizer/Captain of a monthly debate system which pre-selects a debate subject for the following month, and then determines at the following monthly meeting, by the flip of a coin, who will argue pro or con, I find it very offensive when someone applies a political "label" to an individual that can present pro or con arguments to a subject. I'm the "devils' advocate" for virtually any subject, have advocated and won an odd number of objective judges for our debates, which has avoided stalemates. I believe that generally defined rules, and a singular moderator are necessary for some topics. Just my opinion folks, but it's like a**h****, every one seems to have one that may often spew excrement, [/SIZE][/B][/SIZE][SIZE=7][B][SIZE=3]found unacceptable to some. I again vote "C", as it appears that some subjects generate civil degradation of discussion. [/SIZE][/B][/SIZE][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Bullion Investing
>
Regarding the Future of the Bullion Section
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...