Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;mrbrklyn, post: 939118, member: 4381&quot;]Persoanlly, I don&#039;t believe it is so hard to demarcate a political message.&nbsp; A statement of a previous political fact should be fine </p><p><br /></p><p>ex:&nbsp; FDR banned gold ownership and that killed the double eagles</p><p><br /></p><p>A statement of projected future political statement without an opinion for or against is fine</p><p><br /></p><p>ex:&nbsp; If congress seriously audits the fed the price of gold will go through the roof</p><p><br /></p><p>A statement about past political activity with an opinion for or against it:&nbsp; Should be disallowed</p><p>ex - Ending the Gold standard is pushing us to hyperinflation and was a terrible idea.</p><p><br /></p><p>A statement about current or future political opinion should just not be allowed.</p><p><br /></p><p>ex:&nbsp; We need a gold standard to save the nation</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>A statement recruiting others to a political opinion should be disallowed</p><p><br /></p><p>ex:&nbsp; I vote for Ron Paul because he is for a gold standard...and you should vote for him as well.</p><p>or</p><p>ex Obama is an idiot for bailing out the banks and he is killing the value of our money</p><p><br /></p><p>Both should be disallowed.</p><p><br /></p><p>Any statement not directly related to coins should be disallowed</p><p><br /></p><p>ex - Ronald Reagan IMO was a racist:&nbsp; or ex Jimmy Carter was a fool allowing Iran to push us around.</p><p><br /></p><p>I just don&#039;t think it is really that hard to determine when a political point is a rules violation.&nbsp; Its pretty simple.&nbsp; If it is evangelizing, it is not appropriate for cointalk[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in