Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;imrich, post: 934208, member: 22331&quot;]<b>An Appropriate Interjection?</b></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><b>I believe that Dougs&#039; use of the word damn is a patiently appropriate expression of irritation, as one might find the word defined in a collegiate dictionary, and he needn&#039;t defend himself. I suspect that I speak for the majority in commending the moderators for their considerate efforts in maintaining a civil atmosphere when seemingly contentious subjects are discussed. I personally voted for &quot;choice C&quot;, as I recognize that those who would ignore/violate the prominently displayed rules for discourse when discussing controversial subjects, are just inconsiderate to the majority. Members of a civil society generally appreciate &quot;police&quot;, but take exception to a &quot;police state&quot;. It would be foolhardy to add &quot;police&quot; because of the actions of a minority, and ignoring the antics of few leads to site degradation for those who would prefer learned discussion. I trust that objectivity/respect will exist if those voting to maintain &quot;status quo&quot; prevail, but strongly suggest that if PM/politics/theology can&#039;t be studied without general offense, their extensive&nbsp; mention should probably be relegated to an isolated site apart from one which namedly values learning about Numismatics Et Al. I plead that those with a civil agenda will join the moderators in assisting to maintain an atmosphere of relative peaceful discourse. I personally greatly appreciate the balanced efforts of the moderators on this site, and extend thanks for same. :hug:</b></p><p><b></b>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in