Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;SilverSurfer, post: 963692, member: 21603&quot;]&quot; I don&#039;t disagree that gold may have done better than stocks equal&nbsp; number of years, but that is meaningless compared to the level of&nbsp; outperformance.&quot;</p><p><br /></p><p>&quot;I don&#039;t think the point is to &quot;prove&quot; gold is better, but only that&nbsp; there are time periods when one investment outperforms the other.&nbsp; No&nbsp; investment is always best&quot;</p><p><br /></p><p>&quot;&nbsp; Of course, both gold and stocks could both of been falling in value&nbsp; during this time period, but maybe gold didn&#039;t fall as far as stock did,&nbsp; which would still make gold the better performer, even though both are&nbsp; losing value.&quot; </p><p><br /></p><p>I think we are coming to a consensus.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in