Pictures of my latest coins for NGC submission

Results are in, and I gotta say, I am disappointed overall. One or two did Ok, but I thinked they missed a few as well.

001 1908 $2.5 AU 58
002 1908 $2.5 AU 58
003 1913 $2.5 MS 61
004 1927 $2.5 UNC DETAILS IMPROPERLY CLEANED (Does not looked cleaned to me)
005 1911 $2.5 MS 60
006 1911 $2.5 AU 55
007 1911 $2.5 AU DETAILS MOUNT REMOVED (Was hoping for 1911-D here)
008 1908 $2.5 MS 60
009 1909 $2.5 MS 61
010 1926 $2.5 UNC DETAILS REV DAMAGE (Pretty sure this is a planchet flaw error, not damage)
011 1911 $2.5 AU 58
012 1929 $2.5 MS 62 (Excited about this one, this was the awesome toned one)
013 1913 $2.5 MS 61
014 1914 $2.5 AU 58

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

After reviewing the grades again, I think it did OK overall. I disagree with number 4, 7, and 10. Might have to submit these again later. I was hoping for a homerun in the group to recover the cost of grading, but the homerun for me was the toned gold, number 12, which I am keeping. If number 7 was graded weak D, it would have been my homerun. I still think it is one.

 

Why not send #7 to PCGS, just to be sure a different grader has a look at it...?

 

It will probably be going in again... whether to NGC again or pcgs

 

Congrats on #12

When you get them back in hand, can you take better pictures of #4, 7, and 10? I am interested in these for educational purposes.

 

I will see what I can do. I have pictures of number 10 somewhere on these boards... I remember it was a discussion on whether it was damage or planchet flaw. I still think flaw.

 

Got a link?

 

Looking for it... here is a link for number 12... shows the color a little better.
https://www.cointalk.com/threads/thoughts-on-this-toned-2-1-2-gold-indian.263274/

 

Here is coin 10
https://www.cointalk.com/threads/is-this-an-error-2-1-2-indian.262577/

 

Congrats again on #12

#10, I think I agree with Conder101. It doesn't look like a planchet flaw - but these incuse Indians are weird and you have to think about them differently.