Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Bullion Investing
>
Krugger or not to Krugger ?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Jim Dale, post: 7939723, member: 100459"]As a retired State Auditor for North Carolina, I have little trust on information or confirmation from people that are supposed to have great trust. I don't trust anything that is considered to be valid unless have have access to the information that validates what is considered the "Absolute Truth". One of the great sayings in the accounting world is that "People are as honest as they have to be." I am glad that whoever acquired the coin from WTC, but unless there is Proof that the coin came from the WTC, I don't believe it." I would like to have the "Trail of Custody" before I would accept that coin or anything else that came from the WTC. I am sure that the coin, itself, is real, but who originally took it out of the WTC. Since there is no serial number on the coin, it cannot be identified that way. If the coin was originally "certified" by NGC or PCGS, I would assume that they had pictures or documents or some other way of proving the WTC coin is the same one they had identified originally and when they get their "grubby little hands" on the coin after it took a dive from one of the WTC buildings, I would only agree that they were the same after another independent agency so the documentation can be documented.</p><p>In other words, I don't accept it as a WTC coin unless I can have information to prove it. I hope the new owners did have a third party document the source of the coin.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Jim Dale, post: 7939723, member: 100459"]As a retired State Auditor for North Carolina, I have little trust on information or confirmation from people that are supposed to have great trust. I don't trust anything that is considered to be valid unless have have access to the information that validates what is considered the "Absolute Truth". One of the great sayings in the accounting world is that "People are as honest as they have to be." I am glad that whoever acquired the coin from WTC, but unless there is Proof that the coin came from the WTC, I don't believe it." I would like to have the "Trail of Custody" before I would accept that coin or anything else that came from the WTC. I am sure that the coin, itself, is real, but who originally took it out of the WTC. Since there is no serial number on the coin, it cannot be identified that way. If the coin was originally "certified" by NGC or PCGS, I would assume that they had pictures or documents or some other way of proving the WTC coin is the same one they had identified originally and when they get their "grubby little hands" on the coin after it took a dive from one of the WTC buildings, I would only agree that they were the same after another independent agency so the documentation can be documented. In other words, I don't accept it as a WTC coin unless I can have information to prove it. I hope the new owners did have a third party document the source of the coin.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Bullion Investing
>
Krugger or not to Krugger ?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...