Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;CamaroDMD, post: 7936170, member: 5233&quot;]I think there are two different issues with this comment.</p><p><br /></p><p>First, the &quot;blood money&quot; argument.&nbsp; If your position is that someone is profiting off a tragedy I guess that argument can be made.&nbsp; On the flip side, coins tied to historical events are popular.&nbsp; In my mind, this is no different than a shipwreck coin.&nbsp; It&#039;s not really my thing, but I don&#039;t see any issue with it.&nbsp; I feel that the comment &quot;blood money&quot; ties some kind of morality (or lack there of) to owning/selling this coin and I just don&#039;t agree with that.</p><p><br /></p><p>As for the &quot;if the source is legit&quot; a argument...that doesn&#039;t really hold water for me.&nbsp; There is no way to tie the provenance to this coin after the first sale.&nbsp; Because 1978 Kruggers all look the same, a letter or paperwork to document it&#039;s history would not hold a lot of weight.&nbsp; Slabbing by a well respected TPG ties the provenance to the coin.&nbsp; As long as the coin remains in the slab, the history is confirmed.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in