Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;medoraman, post: 1380699, member: 26302&quot;]The problem I see with this is who is the Forum King who gets to decide which post is a &quot;relevant or complete thought&quot;? That&#039;s the sticky wicket, right? I mean, if I post I question the predictive model of market resistance levels cited by Inflexion, would that be &quot;relevant&quot;? If I correct an assertion someone makes in another post is that &quot;relevant&quot;? If I simply say I agree or disagree is that &quot;relevant&quot;?</p><p><br /></p><p>Its a tough call sir, when you get to the details, right? I mean, of course there are people who will post &quot;I love pizza!&quot; for no reason, and there are others like Desertgem, Cloud, Inflexion, and Fatima who at times will post very informative posts. In between, though, is a whole array of posts of varying qualitative value depending on your perspective. </p><p><br /></p><p>I guess I am not one to say I have a right to make those decisions on who is &quot;valuable&quot; and who isn&#039;t. Maybe because there are probably a few here who view every post of mine as not &quot;valuable&quot;. In your mind who IS or SHOULD BE the one who has such Solomenic knowledge to make such judgments? Doug? <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>Chris[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in