Just Passed 100 Oz of silver!

Discussion in 'Bullion Investing' started by physics-fan3.14, Apr 6, 2025.

  1. Eric the Red

    Eric the Red Exploring the World of Coins Supporter

    I don't mind Kilos for stacking. Not to big, not to small. They are about the size of a 10 OZ bar only thicker. 20250405_140404.jpg 20250405_135508.jpg
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    A Kilo bar would be 3x as big... that's 32 ounces!
     
  4. -jeffB

    -jeffB Greshams LEO Supporter

    My other concern with bigger bars is that it's harder to verify them. With a large silver bar, there's a lot more room to work with if you want to fill it with something other than silver.

    I'd be even more reluctant to go after large gold bars -- there, the only thing they're likely to be filled with is tungsten, but when you're dealing with tens or hundreds of ounces in a single lump, there's a huge incentive to cheat.
     
    charley likes this.
  5. Heavymetal

    Heavymetal Well-Known Member

    Cheaters? Ye of little faith
     
  6. -jeffB

    -jeffB Greshams LEO Supporter

    If I were shelling out for a 100oz gold bar, it'd be "trust, but VERIFY."
     
    charley and Heavymetal like this.
  7. rte

    rte Well-Known Member

    And then melting it into another bar before the deal is done.
    I gamble a little :p but certainly not $300,000 Worth.
     
    -jeffB likes this.
  8. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    Specific gravity don't lie. You might fool an XRF, but simple weight and volume can't be fooled.
     
    imrich and ldhair like this.
  9. charley

    charley Well-Known Member

    Yes, it can be.
     
  10. -jeffB

    -jeffB Greshams LEO Supporter

    Gold's density: 19.32
    Tungsten's density: 19.25 to 19.3 (sources vary)

    If you're up against people whose technique is enough better than mine to distinguish those, trim the tungsten core with platinum (density 21.45) until the match is perfect. Platinum costs a third as much as gold; you're still coming out way ahead.
     
    masterswimmer and ldhair like this.
  11. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    Huh. Good to know.
     
  12. -jeffB

    -jeffB Greshams LEO Supporter

    I don't pretend to be any sort of big-league bullion trader, but I've seen plenty of articles indicating that tungsten cores are a very real problem. At one point, you could buy tungsten-core fake AGEs from AliExpress for about a quarter of gold spot. I expect you still can.

    AGEs are just as difficult to fake convincingly as other US coins; if you've got an eye for detail and your guard is up, you probably stand a good chance of catching them. Generic poured gold bars, though? Welcome back to the wild, wild West, or perhaps I should say East...
     
  13. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    Easiest way to counter that is to only buy from reputable dealers, I guess. I've been buying from Apmex, so I don't worry about any of that.
     
  14. bsowa1029

    bsowa1029 Franklin Half Addict

    Congrats on your milestone. I agree with the 10 oz size, they feel great in the hand. I also like the 5 oz bars too.
     
  15. GoldFinger1969

    GoldFinger1969 Well-Known Member

    Do you collect just bullion as close to the silver spot price, or will you buy other items like coins, commemoratives, etc.
     
  16. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    I'm split half-and-half right now with the 10 oz Royal Canadian bars and 90% silver (almost entirely Washington quarters).

    I will probably avoid any art bars or rounds... most of them don't appeal to me.
     
    GoldFinger1969 likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page