Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;InfleXion, post: 1668836, member: 29012&quot;]The evidence in this case is clear, multiple advance e-mails to the CFTC calling precise market movements. Whether that should be enough for a conviction in a court of law I wouldn&#039;t know as I am not a lawyer, and we know that the legal system will bend as needed to powerful interests. </p><p><br /></p><p>Chilton&#039;s comments about &quot;nefarious activity&quot; in the silver market also indicate there is more than meets the eye, but he isn&#039;t really qualified for his position because he thinks it&#039;s only 10 to 1 leverage in the silver market where as it is actually far greater. </p><p><br /></p><p>As was pointed out in the comments section of the article:</p><p><br /></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><br /></p><p>To infer that this case being dismissed equates to proof that there is no manipulation is a leap of faith, but of course the burden of proof is on showing that there is manipulation. So nothing has changed by this ruling.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in