Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Bullion Investing
>
Is it just me, or...
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="medoraman, post: 1732018, member: 26302"]My only responses Mike would be ASEs are sourced as prepared blanks of certified US silver with high technical specs. Most people do not complain about the quality of circulation coinage but scream about ASE quality. Then they have to make dies for large coins on special production runs. Between all of that, and the wholesaler middleman "authorized purchasers" then the retailers, I am not so sure THAT much profit remains. Maybe $2 per like Woody describes is adequate for production, markups, and retail profits, but still the point is some FLAT number is simply a conversion fee. Analyzing a fixed conversion fee on an percentage basis can lead to some very incorrect conclusions. Maybe the best analysis would have both a flat and variable component, but I simply find it easiest to take a single flat number, since its my assertion most of the markup is static conversion fees. </p><p><br /></p><p>Put it this way, what would the premium on an ASE be if silver dropped to $1 on our two models, lets say it sells for $4. For me, it would be purchase price minus $1, (lets just say $3). For you, you would say its 300% markup. Lets change the price of silver to $100. My assertion is it should still be $3, but for you it would be 3% markup. Kind of different ways of looking at the same numbers, no?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="medoraman, post: 1732018, member: 26302"]My only responses Mike would be ASEs are sourced as prepared blanks of certified US silver with high technical specs. Most people do not complain about the quality of circulation coinage but scream about ASE quality. Then they have to make dies for large coins on special production runs. Between all of that, and the wholesaler middleman "authorized purchasers" then the retailers, I am not so sure THAT much profit remains. Maybe $2 per like Woody describes is adequate for production, markups, and retail profits, but still the point is some FLAT number is simply a conversion fee. Analyzing a fixed conversion fee on an percentage basis can lead to some very incorrect conclusions. Maybe the best analysis would have both a flat and variable component, but I simply find it easiest to take a single flat number, since its my assertion most of the markup is static conversion fees. Put it this way, what would the premium on an ASE be if silver dropped to $1 on our two models, lets say it sells for $4. For me, it would be purchase price minus $1, (lets just say $3). For you, you would say its 300% markup. Lets change the price of silver to $100. My assertion is it should still be $3, but for you it would be 3% markup. Kind of different ways of looking at the same numbers, no?[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Bullion Investing
>
Is it just me, or...
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...