Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;fatima, post: 1326606, member: 22143&quot;]No.&nbsp; You don&#039;t win arguments by extracting a couple of words out of context then responding to it as if the context didn&#039;t exist.&nbsp; I also didn&#039;t say that gold matched money in circulation.&nbsp; I stopped at the 1913 comment as that was simply irrelevant and incorrect as well, and it isn&#039;t worth my time to continue with the folderol.&nbsp;&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>I&#039;ve made my point about why gold in Ft. Knox is necessary, legally required, and what damage it would cause to the economy if it were found not to be there.&nbsp; &nbsp; If it is your opinion that it isn&#039;t important than so be it, but don&#039;t expect that I would consider this to be any evidence to the contrary.&nbsp; &nbsp; The United States government, via it&#039;s actions thinks otherwise or they wouldn&#039;t have 1000s of troops there to protect Ft. Knox.&nbsp; Obviously there is a great importance to it and it&#039;s folly to think they are maintaining this depository simply for the fun of it.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in