Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;InfleXion, post: 1325427, member: 29012&quot;]No offense taken, and I never asserted the gold wasn&#039;t there since I do not know. What I&#039;m saying is that if it is there it should not be a big deal to audit it. They did it in the 50&#039;s, so there&#039;s no reason I can think of not to do it unless there is less gold there than expected. The security is easily attainable information online as well as in documentaries, so I don&#039;t think that&#039;s a viable concern. There aren&#039;t enough tungsten bars to fill the place so that wouldn&#039;t make or break their ability to make new coins. And there is something they can to do satisfy the conspiracy theorists which is to perform an audit of something that Congress has full authority to call upon. The reason for identifying the amount of gold there is because the people who the gold belongs to have a right to know. Why would they have guards if there&#039;s no gold, because in that case they&#039;d need to maintain the illusion of having the gold otherwise the owners would freak out. I don&#039;t understand why this is not obvious. Comparing it to monsters that have no actual proof of existence seems out of context to me. That requiress putting faith in something without proof, as opposed to questioning the validity of something that is lacking proof.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in