Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;medoraman, post: 1325370, member: 26302&quot;]Two points, yes there is issues with showing a secured facility. The FIRST rule of security is to not let them know where its at. That is long gone. The second rule is you NEVER show the facility and your security unless absolutely necessary. I think the bars are there, they cannot be tungsten since they are not pure gold, they are mainly melted down US coinage so a tungsten bar would not be the right SG. </p><p><br /></p><p>I simply believe its there, but the gov&#039;t knows there is nothing you can do to satisfy some conspiracy theorists. The dollar value of Ft Knox gold will not change our debt situation, so WHY would they risk having it being gone leaked to the press? Military guards are there, if it was gone someone would eventually talk. I would simply be more likely to believe the Loch Ness monster is alive, or Yeti is real, before I buy into the idea that Ft Knox is empty. Honestly, this entire discussion and the fact many PM buyers believe it kind of gives a black eye to PM investors in the public&#039;s view. </p><p><br /></p><p>No offense meant to anyone, just my opinion.</p><p><br /></p><p>Chris[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in