Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;krispy, post: 1302620, member: 19065&quot;]The proposed design of the Palladium Eagle coin would look something like this. but probably not as high relief:</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="http://www.cointalk.com/attachments/96963d1285627840t-pallo.png" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /><img src="http://www.cointalk.com/attachments/96962d1285627833t-pallr.png" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Earlier plans for a palladium UHR fell through, that was what I was really excited for. Unfortunately, the bill calls for one ounce coins only, but it would have been interesting if they opted for a half ounce only for this coin. The lesser amount of precious metals would have brought the price down and invited more initial buyers to help boost interest in the plan. But who am I but another numismatic observer of failing Mint strategies and clueless coin legislation that crank out programs of little to no public interest and too high of production levels for many other inferior designs. The&nbsp; larger reason previous coin designs are used for Eagle products is only to help pass the bills and get people interested enough to buy or invest in such bullion and collectibles. Regardless, I am eager to have palladium added to the full range of silver, gold and platinum Eagles.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in