Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Blueindian65, post: 686320, member: 17310&quot;]The anti-semitism part is the way he talks about mossad (isralie equivlent) of the cia. I&#039;m willing to say I might of over analysed that part, but form the tone, yes you can have a written tone, he is not a big fan of the israle governemnt. There is an argument to be made as to weather that is or is not anti-symetic. So even if unintentional still not a very nice way to talk about people. I read it again and he does accuse them of being money laundering theves. Lots of senseitve metaphores with this. Ie money hungrey Jews being offensive. Sure not blatent but its implied if noathing else, and it is prety clear that he does not like America</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>I am 100% serious about everything else I said. Especaly the part about paying out the contracts. it is not about &quot;rich people going busto&quot;, but about the integrety of contract law, and for that matter the money was paid out to foregin banks which used depositer money to buy safe bonds that where not so safe after all. I am not a big fan of government bailouts, but I do belive in free trade and the integrety of the world trade organization. If we are going to bail our banks/ companies out we have to live up to there contractual obligaitions. I think on the reverse side that what happend to Chrysler bond holders was an absolute disgrace. They got screwed out of money because our hack of a presedendt labled them as &quot;rich speculaers&quot; but gm bond holders who where &quot;working class men&quot; and the labor union got a much higher premium. Classist rhetoric is wrong. if I buy pay you money to insure a bond and the bond goes bad you should pay my policy. It is a priavate contract. You take my money you ow me the money back when I need my insurance. This goes to the very hart of the china silver agrument in his article. China writes contracts to pay silver. They decided they don&#039;t want to give the silver out after the fact. Thats BS</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>As to his qualifications. O.K. he knows a little somthing about metal traing, but as far as shadow goverments and the iluminati take away any credibilty he may have goes away. He is obviously a conspirecy hack clowed is very correct when he asserts that this man spews more bs then a sewage drain. </p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>And my first paragraph just to make this clear. </p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>1. We made it to the moon multiple times, and Mars for that matter. We will make it even farther as technology advances, and if people in central flordia can live with nuclear powerd rockets.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>2. We ratified the 14th amendment. only racist d bags object to this fact.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>3. 9-11 was not an inside job</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>4. The federal reserve is not an eveil instituion Andrew Jackson already proved what happens when we don&#039;t have a central curancy. IE the crash of 1837. Also interstate commerce is a good thing, and we need a way for our country to borrow money, and we need people to set our monitary policy.&nbsp; </p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>This is a free country and your welcome to disagree with me. I just think the man is a hack. He may know things about investing in metals, but his complete lack of a grip on reality makes it very hard to take him serious. </p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>So to answer your question no I am not being sarcastic[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in