Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Bullion Investing
>
I Says it Once and I Says it Again
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="desertgem, post: 1906070, member: 15199"]"But on January 7, 1980, in response to the Hunts' accumulation, the exchange rules regarding <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leverage_%28finance%29" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leverage_%28finance%29" rel="nofollow">leverage</a> were changed, when <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Mercantile_Exchange" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Mercantile_Exchange" rel="nofollow">COMEX</a> adopted "Silver Rule 7" placing heavy restrictions on the purchase of commodities on <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margin_%28finance%29" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margin_%28finance%29" rel="nofollow">margin</a>."</p><p><br /></p><p>Your quote is true. Now read this also</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="http://web.pdx.edu/~jjackson/HuntSilver.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://web.pdx.edu/~jjackson/HuntSilver.html" rel="nofollow">http://web.pdx.edu/~jjackson/HuntSilver.html</a></p><p><br /></p><p>You can see that the CME tried to fulfill their responsibility under the preceeding margin requirements, but Hunts , possibly collaborating with Saudi and other foreign concerns didn't play fair ( IMO ) and was forced to change the number of contracts that could be held on margin. </p><p> I know that some people believe it was just another conspiracy to keep bullionists down, but it was 3 or so bullionists trying to make multimillions quickly. The Hunts tried the same process with Water in southern California, and the Feds stepped in and stopped it. It was their MO. </p><p><br /></p><p>"but the fact is that if the government or mega-banks decide its in their best interest to either increase or decrease the price of precious metals, they can heavily affect the price through various means."</p><p><br /></p><p> Any person group of people or company with access to trading futures and a few billion in funds can readily change ( either direction) the price of any stock or commodity, with or without assistance. What prevents this from occurring is limitations with margin. You should notice that the Rule 7 mentioned by you only limits the number of contracts under margin, not if originally purchased for delivery. So the Hunts could have continued buying physical silver contracts if they were just stacking, but they were not.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="desertgem, post: 1906070, member: 15199"]"But on January 7, 1980, in response to the Hunts' accumulation, the exchange rules regarding [URL='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leverage_%28finance%29']leverage[/URL] were changed, when [URL='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Mercantile_Exchange']COMEX[/URL] adopted "Silver Rule 7" placing heavy restrictions on the purchase of commodities on [URL='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margin_%28finance%29']margin[/URL]." Your quote is true. Now read this also [url]http://web.pdx.edu/~jjackson/HuntSilver.html[/url] You can see that the CME tried to fulfill their responsibility under the preceeding margin requirements, but Hunts , possibly collaborating with Saudi and other foreign concerns didn't play fair ( IMO ) and was forced to change the number of contracts that could be held on margin. I know that some people believe it was just another conspiracy to keep bullionists down, but it was 3 or so bullionists trying to make multimillions quickly. The Hunts tried the same process with Water in southern California, and the Feds stepped in and stopped it. It was their MO. "but the fact is that if the government or mega-banks decide its in their best interest to either increase or decrease the price of precious metals, they can heavily affect the price through various means." Any person group of people or company with access to trading futures and a few billion in funds can readily change ( either direction) the price of any stock or commodity, with or without assistance. What prevents this from occurring is limitations with margin. You should notice that the Rule 7 mentioned by you only limits the number of contracts under margin, not if originally purchased for delivery. So the Hunts could have continued buying physical silver contracts if they were just stacking, but they were not.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Bullion Investing
>
I Says it Once and I Says it Again
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...