How much should I expect to pay for a Charles I and Elizabeth I shilling?

Discussion in 'World Coins' started by Nathan F, Aug 31, 2020.

  1. Nathan F

    Nathan F Well-Known Member

    image.jpg image.jpg image.jpg
    [​IMG]
    Thinking of picking up these two and would greatly appreciate others opinions on how much I should expect to pay separately!
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. robinjojo

    robinjojo Well-Known Member

  4. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan Eclectic & Eccentric Moderator

    I would indeed recommend holding out for better examples without so much damage. "Honest wear" is one thing- and there is nothing wrong with buying low-grade coins as inexpensively as possible. But damage is another story.

    (*Unless you're deliberately collecting damaged coins- like I do with holed pieces- and getting them at a steep discount.)


    I'd try to go for something with better eye appeal, even if it's still low grade.

    That being said, those coins you posted do still have some historical appeal. If they're cheap- really cheap- then sure, why not? Undamaged is better, but old beat-up coins can still have some appeal under certain circumstances. It is a matter of personal preference.

    Your basic question about price is impossible to answer since there are so many different variables and types, not to mention different grades and "curveball" issues like the problems on the coins above.

    It's kind of like asking "how much does a car cost"? Maybe somebody could give you a general range, like "oh, somewhere between five hundred and five million bucks", but it's an impossible question to answer precisely, because there are far too many variables.

    I can certainly understand your interest in this era.

    I chose a sixpence of Elizabeth I rather than a shilling, simply because I wanted a dated coin, and only the smaller denominations seem to have been dated.

    After getting it slabbed, I'm into mine for about $270 USD. I bought it for the clear portrait, and the contrasting toning. It was a while before I found one that I liked that I could also actually afford.

    England: silver sixpence of Elizabeth I, 1575, Tower mint, eglantine mintmark
    [​IMG]
     
  5. robp

    robp Well-Known Member

    I wouldn't bother with these two. You can pick up a decent example of either coin for 2 or 3 hundred.
     
    robinjojo likes this.
  6. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan Eclectic & Eccentric Moderator

    And even if you don't want to or can't spend that much, there are more appealing "budget" examples.
     
  7. scottishmoney

    scottishmoney Buh bye

    Those are regret later coins. I bought stuff like that when I got serious into collecting in my teenage years and wisht I had held out for better stuff. Those two coins got a harsh and undeserved cleaning much after they were minted.
     
  8. TheFinn

    TheFinn Well-Known Member

  9. Nathan F

    Nathan F Well-Known Member

    Thanks for the thoughts. The Elizabeth is 30 while the Charles is 45 does that make them worth while or still no.
     
  10. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan Eclectic & Eccentric Moderator

    Up to you. You'll not likely be getting any other Elizabethan silver for 30 bucks, without issues. If you're OK with the knowledge that these are "problem" coins and don't mind the damage in exchange for the relatively lower price, then OK.

    I sold an Elizabethan piece for 20 bucks not long ago. I personally think it was better looking than that. However, it was a tiny silver penny, not a big shilling. So there ya go.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page