Reply to Thread

Message:: [QUOTE="desertgem, post: 1720486, member: 15199"]At the beginning of the articles, he boldly says "FACTS" and then explaining this farther, he says "SPECULATION","the most reasonable speculation"."So whether Fact #1 caused Fact #2 or vice versa is irrelevant." The easiest answer would be to". "These are all indisputable facts, not speculation."Was it mere coincidence ...I will let you be the judge of the connection between these two events, as this is the first speculation" "I don’t know if it has since been confirmed that Merrill Lynch was the  agent that executed this dirty takedown, but obviously an agent of the  Federal Reserve was used to instigate panic selling in the paper gold  markets", "Of course the CFTC will tell you that futures contracts were never  intended for physical delivery but only as a hedging mechanism ", and I could go on about facts changing to speculation or worse through out the rant. It wore out my "aluminum foil hat" ( not true of course, but should be obvious) before I was half way down the page. If one believes it .....their mind is epoxied against logic and reason.[/QUOTE]