Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Bullion Investing
>
History repeating itself, we've learned nothing
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Blueindian65, post: 752719, member: 17310"]Mr. Joe,</p><p> </p><p>Your very correct that I should of been more clear in my criticism. We should call it the "Western Empire" that way we can be more correct. Its funy the "Barbarians" had little to know imperial asperations so as Rome was sacked, but a lot remained the same. For The most part the church took its place as the dominant figure. I do think the cato institue sux and Libertarians in genral, because they ignore that the governemnt is nessecary to attempt to check for evil in the world, and attempt to solve market ineficiances. A perfect example is the FDA. Before the FDA people where being sold dangerous products. Meat factores where rancid places. Morphine and other drugs where sold unregulated and many other problems. Ocea and the Labor department, while true having problems now, are another example. We no longer have childern working in coal mines to save $ for the owners, because of labor laws. This is also the paradox of post-madernity, but I live by choice in a right to work state and will bash unions with the best of them. One does not have to be pro-union to be pro regulation of the labor market.</p><p> </p><p>Another example would be the SEC, true they do a real poor job currently, but you don't want people selling crap to old peole just to steel their money... I hope my perspective is clear</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>O.K. About me being a commie: This is patenly untrue. I agree with Hart and Negri that Captialism destorys forms of life it finds un-productive and utltimatly causes many problems in the world. I also agree that they are correct when they state that the old "impierial Modle" of control in the world is dead and that what has replaced it is "Empire" a decentralized force that is seen in Globalized power structures. On the other hand I think they are wrong about globalzation being net worse than there "alternative". That does not meen though that they are wrong about the nature of the satues quoe. Michale Fouclaut wrote a great pice about the way that "The Prolatarete" ultimaly redepolies the same forms of diciplinary power and opression that they strive to overcome. Its in a Book Called <i>Power / Knowledge</i></p><p> </p><p>In plain english. Capitalism structures society the way it is. Our socity is perpetuates itself by instilling, threw disipliary institutions, (schools, The Family, hospitals, mental institutions, the military, Religion, Civil Society) all produce a standerd "life" that seems correct, but utlimatly prevent people from embracing life qua life or life for life sake. An Example a wall street banker that makes hundreds of millions of dollars is no better than a homless musician that just sits and creates butey in the world, but in our society the homless musical drunk is a "faliure" that has to be regulated, while Doctors, Lawyers, and Busniess executives are exahlted as the ultimate sucess sotries. </p><p> </p><p>Another Important idea is Micro-Facism: Micro Facism is the facism of the self. We belive so deply in our socity and our way of doing things that we ultimatly forgoe other ways of excising and being. The quesition is Ultimalty how does Empire make us desire our own represion. I think this alwo trumps all libertarian arguments about contract rites and loss of freedom. Because it is a prerequisite. A value Premis if you will </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>That being said. I belive that Capitalism is the best worst option. In hippy fantasey world Hart and Negri are right. The problem is if we lived like they wanted us to we would all starve to death and die of diseas. The worst part is that now only poor fokes starve to death and die of diseas. That is where the government has to step in. I respect them. I think that we should embrace diversity and not strive to destroy that which is differnt. I hate the IMF and the World bank. It is sickingin that countries can not have roads irregation hospitals because they have to pay us our money back. Basickly we are all shylock looking for our LB of flesh. </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Also though I am a principle in a small busniess. I bust my ass for my family and I love what I do. I think my work is art, and we help peoples busniess become better. Thus making there life better. So commie no. Libertarian Hell no. </p><p> </p><p>On a side note I also like supply side economics becaue I think it provides more tax money not because taxes are bad. </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Why the books matter</p><p> </p><p>The repbulic: 1st Yes it is an amazing book. The meat is book 5-7. I have read and studied it many times. If you have an questions please ask. Best book about government there is. I belive that the western empire fell because the empores became slaves to there own desire. They lost the logic and reason nesecary to run an emprie. So long as in america we ellect hard working smart People who love wisdom. Philosophy in greek then we will be fine. Sadly though For Plato Democory is the Third worst type of government, but our republic should solve a lot of these problems. Because we do not have direct representation. 2000 years ago he said that people who inhearte money will have it taken from them in bad busniess deals and then ultimaly support tyrants who say they will avenge the unjust nature of prosperus. It is scary how similear it is to today. </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Emprie: 1. It is a great book. Proboly the most important book in political economy in the last 40 years. Second I think if we fail to miss the fundemtal change in reality that has occerd sense the 2nd world war we will never solve the problems that exist in the world today. Also the Chapter on bio-power and capitalism is amazing. The economy of power can be a scary thing. It is not Pax Romana or Pax Americana, But Pax Capital. </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>I will spell check this when I have more time. I hope it makes sense. I love the Republic I have read it many many times. Also I read empire for the first time when I was 16 It made a hudge impresion on my life. I look forward to continuing this conversation with you. Like I said im going to re-read the article and look for specfic quotes to ty with my opions. Thank you for starting this discoution I have really enjoyed it today.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Blueindian65, post: 752719, member: 17310"]Mr. Joe, Your very correct that I should of been more clear in my criticism. We should call it the "Western Empire" that way we can be more correct. Its funy the "Barbarians" had little to know imperial asperations so as Rome was sacked, but a lot remained the same. For The most part the church took its place as the dominant figure. I do think the cato institue sux and Libertarians in genral, because they ignore that the governemnt is nessecary to attempt to check for evil in the world, and attempt to solve market ineficiances. A perfect example is the FDA. Before the FDA people where being sold dangerous products. Meat factores where rancid places. Morphine and other drugs where sold unregulated and many other problems. Ocea and the Labor department, while true having problems now, are another example. We no longer have childern working in coal mines to save $ for the owners, because of labor laws. This is also the paradox of post-madernity, but I live by choice in a right to work state and will bash unions with the best of them. One does not have to be pro-union to be pro regulation of the labor market. Another example would be the SEC, true they do a real poor job currently, but you don't want people selling crap to old peole just to steel their money... I hope my perspective is clear O.K. About me being a commie: This is patenly untrue. I agree with Hart and Negri that Captialism destorys forms of life it finds un-productive and utltimatly causes many problems in the world. I also agree that they are correct when they state that the old "impierial Modle" of control in the world is dead and that what has replaced it is "Empire" a decentralized force that is seen in Globalized power structures. On the other hand I think they are wrong about globalzation being net worse than there "alternative". That does not meen though that they are wrong about the nature of the satues quoe. Michale Fouclaut wrote a great pice about the way that "The Prolatarete" ultimaly redepolies the same forms of diciplinary power and opression that they strive to overcome. Its in a Book Called [I]Power / Knowledge[/I] In plain english. Capitalism structures society the way it is. Our socity is perpetuates itself by instilling, threw disipliary institutions, (schools, The Family, hospitals, mental institutions, the military, Religion, Civil Society) all produce a standerd "life" that seems correct, but utlimatly prevent people from embracing life qua life or life for life sake. An Example a wall street banker that makes hundreds of millions of dollars is no better than a homless musician that just sits and creates butey in the world, but in our society the homless musical drunk is a "faliure" that has to be regulated, while Doctors, Lawyers, and Busniess executives are exahlted as the ultimate sucess sotries. Another Important idea is Micro-Facism: Micro Facism is the facism of the self. We belive so deply in our socity and our way of doing things that we ultimatly forgoe other ways of excising and being. The quesition is Ultimalty how does Empire make us desire our own represion. I think this alwo trumps all libertarian arguments about contract rites and loss of freedom. Because it is a prerequisite. A value Premis if you will That being said. I belive that Capitalism is the best worst option. In hippy fantasey world Hart and Negri are right. The problem is if we lived like they wanted us to we would all starve to death and die of diseas. The worst part is that now only poor fokes starve to death and die of diseas. That is where the government has to step in. I respect them. I think that we should embrace diversity and not strive to destroy that which is differnt. I hate the IMF and the World bank. It is sickingin that countries can not have roads irregation hospitals because they have to pay us our money back. Basickly we are all shylock looking for our LB of flesh. Also though I am a principle in a small busniess. I bust my ass for my family and I love what I do. I think my work is art, and we help peoples busniess become better. Thus making there life better. So commie no. Libertarian Hell no. On a side note I also like supply side economics becaue I think it provides more tax money not because taxes are bad. Why the books matter The repbulic: 1st Yes it is an amazing book. The meat is book 5-7. I have read and studied it many times. If you have an questions please ask. Best book about government there is. I belive that the western empire fell because the empores became slaves to there own desire. They lost the logic and reason nesecary to run an emprie. So long as in america we ellect hard working smart People who love wisdom. Philosophy in greek then we will be fine. Sadly though For Plato Democory is the Third worst type of government, but our republic should solve a lot of these problems. Because we do not have direct representation. 2000 years ago he said that people who inhearte money will have it taken from them in bad busniess deals and then ultimaly support tyrants who say they will avenge the unjust nature of prosperus. It is scary how similear it is to today. Emprie: 1. It is a great book. Proboly the most important book in political economy in the last 40 years. Second I think if we fail to miss the fundemtal change in reality that has occerd sense the 2nd world war we will never solve the problems that exist in the world today. Also the Chapter on bio-power and capitalism is amazing. The economy of power can be a scary thing. It is not Pax Romana or Pax Americana, But Pax Capital. I will spell check this when I have more time. I hope it makes sense. I love the Republic I have read it many many times. Also I read empire for the first time when I was 16 It made a hudge impresion on my life. I look forward to continuing this conversation with you. Like I said im going to re-read the article and look for specfic quotes to ty with my opions. Thank you for starting this discoution I have really enjoyed it today.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Bullion Investing
>
History repeating itself, we've learned nothing
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...