Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;V. Kurt Bellman, post: 1988351, member: 71723&quot;]If you truly want my opinion, it should be as minimal as conceivable, and then even less so. That is my advice from both a practical and legal viewpoint. The only safe haven that the DCMA and other federal law provides is for complete and utter content agnosticism. An insistence on full legal names can be your brake on excess, in the alternative to strongly invasive moderation.</p><p><br /></p><p>And my last comment refers to the change that could have come from a thorough internal discussion and reexamination among the site staff. Alas, &#039;twas not to be.</p><p><br /></p><p>I am not unaware of the ugliness that can result from a <i>laissez faire</i> site management paradigm. I simply believe it would be the preferable of two possibly &quot;warts and all&quot; outcomes. Obviously, CT has decided on the other. Bad combination of preferences. I prefer the free-wheeling type of forum, that&#039;s all. My personal theory is that he who moderates least, moderates best.</p><p><br /></p><p>Same as refereeing at a sporting event. If you can&#039;t remember the refs while going home, you watched a good game.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in