Reply to Thread

Message:: [QUOTE="V. Kurt Bellman, post: 1988225, member: 71723"]Well, when so-called "moderators" are , in my opinion and view, anything but moderate, and desertgem, I AM INDEED referring to you, this is what happens. I have had a few conversations with Peter about this, and he has seen nothing amiss, but still Jim wields an unreasonable axe. Apparently longevity trumps reason. Curious - is there a post editing quota system? It sure looks that way to me. Keep in mind - what passes on the stodgy old ANA's site gets axed by desertgem. You reap what you sow, CT. My "posts" to "likes" ratio remains at 3:1, and I can't find too many higher. SOMEBODY likes my stuff, mostly infrequent posters. You have a "dissent suppression" problem on CT, whether you are aware of it or not. And that is EXACTLY the most frequent knock on CT I've heard. Its moderation is not content neutral. As a committed contrarian in all my coin dealings, I am ALL ABOUT dissent from the typical modal view. And that has financially served me very well, but it WILL undeniably annoy anyone who is used to having the battlefield of ideas to themselves. Peter needs to be careful - when you engage in content editing, you become legally responsible for ALL content, because you have waived your protections under Section 203 of the DMCA law. Yes, I'm not the first to leave, and I won't be the last, but I JUST COULD CONCEIVABLY BE the one that matters in the end. Probably not, but could be.[/QUOTE]