Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Beefer518, post: 3108071, member: 87737&quot;]Perhaps I should have expanded on my guess.</p><p><br /></p><p>I felt the toning was not super attractive, and there was potential that it was held back a point, and given a 66 by PCGS. If that were the case, I felt that it had a technical grade of 67, and if it was graded a 66, it would get a bean. I did not see this as a + grade coin because of the toning, so I didn&#039;t go that route.</p><p><br /></p><p>Does that explain my CAC comment? <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in