Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Bullion Investing
>
Gold prices and silver, 50 years?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="medoraman, post: 1840175, member: 26302"]You know what I don't get? How people continually wish to talk about the disadvantages of fiat currency versus pm. "Money" historically been a medium of exchange and a store of value. I understand that. But in the modern world there is nothing that is both of these things. In the past this was mainly true but that is besides the point. So today you either can temporarily have USD to facilitate trade with a minimum of depreciation risk and exchange fees, OR you can own an asset which will be a store of value. PM might be that asset, but so could hundreds or thousands of other assets. However, any asset will have greater risks of loss and much higher buy/sell fees associated with it, so assets are very bad short term or trade facilitating solutions.</p><p><br /></p><p>So, against this backdrop, we KNOW pm will be higher in terms of nominal dollars in fifty years. How high I have no clue but frankly do not care. What will be important will be how much will pm go up versus other assets, not against the dollar. Leaving your assets in currency we know is the stupidest long term move that you can make. However, this has been true for almost the entire history of the US. So nothing has changed, so any comparison between pm and currency long term is a rather silly, intentionally misleading argument. Its ALWAYS been better to keep your wealth in assets, pm or not, than currency long term. Its a given. This does not, though, mean then that pm is the solution. It may be, or may not.</p><p><br /></p><p>I just thought I would bring that up since I read over and over how pm is better long term to hold than USD. DUH. However, usually the author then uses this obvious logic to "prove" pm should be purchases. The two points have nothing to do with each other. Its like a car salesman saying driving is faster than walking, therefor you should buy my used car. The first part is true, but that does not make the second statement necessarily true.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="medoraman, post: 1840175, member: 26302"]You know what I don't get? How people continually wish to talk about the disadvantages of fiat currency versus pm. "Money" historically been a medium of exchange and a store of value. I understand that. But in the modern world there is nothing that is both of these things. In the past this was mainly true but that is besides the point. So today you either can temporarily have USD to facilitate trade with a minimum of depreciation risk and exchange fees, OR you can own an asset which will be a store of value. PM might be that asset, but so could hundreds or thousands of other assets. However, any asset will have greater risks of loss and much higher buy/sell fees associated with it, so assets are very bad short term or trade facilitating solutions. So, against this backdrop, we KNOW pm will be higher in terms of nominal dollars in fifty years. How high I have no clue but frankly do not care. What will be important will be how much will pm go up versus other assets, not against the dollar. Leaving your assets in currency we know is the stupidest long term move that you can make. However, this has been true for almost the entire history of the US. So nothing has changed, so any comparison between pm and currency long term is a rather silly, intentionally misleading argument. Its ALWAYS been better to keep your wealth in assets, pm or not, than currency long term. Its a given. This does not, though, mean then that pm is the solution. It may be, or may not. I just thought I would bring that up since I read over and over how pm is better long term to hold than USD. DUH. However, usually the author then uses this obvious logic to "prove" pm should be purchases. The two points have nothing to do with each other. Its like a car salesman saying driving is faster than walking, therefor you should buy my used car. The first part is true, but that does not make the second statement necessarily true.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Bullion Investing
>
Gold prices and silver, 50 years?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...