Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Bullion Investing
>
Gold is the Worst Investment in History
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="GoldFinger1969, post: 2096197, member: 73489"]<b>If you read his post, you saw that it shows what happened to the actual Trust. </b> There is no survivorship bias because that implies losses are hidden from results. Losses are not hidden:</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/02/27/voya-longterm-funds-idUSL5N0VY58B20150227" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/02/27/voya-longterm-funds-idUSL5N0VY58B20150227" rel="nofollow">http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/02/27/voya-longterm-funds-idUSL5N0VY58B20150227</a></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Actually, the fees were low on an annual basis. So the structure was designed to attract buy-and-hold investors. Total management fees were quite reasonable over the long haul.</p><p><br /></p><p>I purchased my first mutual funds in the 1980's and the loads were often 8.25%.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><b>You're right, it was BETTER. Check the chart below.</b></p><p><br /></p><p>Jack Bogle, the Dean of Low-Cost Investing, has endorsed the fund.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><b>That's not what the managers said. Reading comprehension is obviously not your strong point.</b></p><p><br /></p><p>The reason the fund's fee structure was a problem was because most mutual funds went to an A-B-C structure. While high-upfront "A" fees like Voya (and my 1st mutual fund) could offer lower OVERALL fees over the long-haul, fidicuaries sometimes feared they would get in trouble if they sold the funds that paid the most upfront to them via commissions.</p><p><br /></p><p>This was especially true of 401(k) plans. No plan sponsor would risk bad publicity if they used someone charging 8.25%.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Right, because retirement and retail flows drive the sector. You are implying they were ripping people off with the old fee structure -- they were NOT.</p><p><br /></p><p><b>The performance of the Voya Trust was FINE from 1935-1974, inclusive of fees.</b></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Whose fault is that ?</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>No, people who can read can understand what is in it. Just because you can't understand it doesn't mean the rest of us can't.<img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie8" alt=":D" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="GoldFinger1969, post: 2096197, member: 73489"][B]If you read his post, you saw that it shows what happened to the actual Trust. [/B] There is no survivorship bias because that implies losses are hidden from results. Losses are not hidden: [url]http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/02/27/voya-longterm-funds-idUSL5N0VY58B20150227[/url] Actually, the fees were low on an annual basis. So the structure was designed to attract buy-and-hold investors. Total management fees were quite reasonable over the long haul. I purchased my first mutual funds in the 1980's and the loads were often 8.25%. [B]You're right, it was BETTER. Check the chart below.[/B] Jack Bogle, the Dean of Low-Cost Investing, has endorsed the fund. [B]That's not what the managers said. Reading comprehension is obviously not your strong point.[/B] The reason the fund's fee structure was a problem was because most mutual funds went to an A-B-C structure. While high-upfront "A" fees like Voya (and my 1st mutual fund) could offer lower OVERALL fees over the long-haul, fidicuaries sometimes feared they would get in trouble if they sold the funds that paid the most upfront to them via commissions. This was especially true of 401(k) plans. No plan sponsor would risk bad publicity if they used someone charging 8.25%. Right, because retirement and retail flows drive the sector. You are implying they were ripping people off with the old fee structure -- they were NOT. [B]The performance of the Voya Trust was FINE from 1935-1974, inclusive of fees.[/B] Whose fault is that ? No, people who can read can understand what is in it. Just because you can't understand it doesn't mean the rest of us can't.:D[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Bullion Investing
>
Gold is the Worst Investment in History
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...