Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;medoraman, post: 1453890, member: 26302&quot;]Sorry for my tone earlier Inflexion. As a background I have worked at a company who paid a $42 million dollar fine when they did nothing wrong, since to fight it would have angered regulators and the company would have been more damaged by forebearances while we were fighting it than the fine cost. I didn&#039;t make this decision but I would have if it had been mine to make. </p><p><br /></p><p>My only point sir is issues like that are easy for the general public to misjudge unless they know the regulatory environment businesses face, and have to deal with. I would say at least half of all fines levied on business are unwarranted but business pays it for fear of regulatory retaliation. The general public does not know this, so its easy to get persuaded that paying a fine means admitting guilt. </p><p><br /></p><p>Same with Maquire&#039;s emails. I don&#039;t know anything about them, but even if true, what does this PROVE? Does it prove he knows illegality is going on, or does it prove he is good at analyzing the market? Proof is what lawyers need, not coincidences. Technical issues like this are a lot like the fine thing, its very easy, if you do not know the background very well, for someone to get convinced of something that simply is not true.</p><p><br /></p><p>Chris[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in