Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Vess1, post: 1060979, member: 13650&quot;]I&#039;d have to agree with that because you have to.&nbsp; The actual physical currency being used hasn&#039;t changed.&nbsp; Some wording has changed and the illustrations have changed a bit but a $20 bill in 1950 could have been saved in 1950 and spent on a dinner today.&nbsp;&nbsp; Even though people brought home much less in pay back then and it would have gone further back then, the fact that it could be saved and spent at face today is the problem.&nbsp;&nbsp; It doesn&#039;t really matter that somebody in their 20s gets paid more today than somebody in their 20s was making in the 1950s, if what they&#039;re attempting to save for retirement will be worthless in the future.&nbsp; </p><p>&nbsp; I believe saving anything but the bare minimum in cash form is a losing game that is only getting worse.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in