Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;ctrl, post: 1409807, member: 13378&quot;]Sometimes society would rather absorb some business problems rather than have tons of people left behind because of corporate malpractice (that totally free markets encourage). If citizens would rather do something to avoid a full collapse of an industry that would have a severe ripple effect across the economy, then what is wrong with that? </p><p><br /></p><p>Look at the auto industry today, posting big big gains yet again. Government acted as lender of last resort and saved jobs and the industry (and yes, as a result covering some business inefficiencies and poor corporate decision-making), allowing the companies to restructure and come out now with those kinds of results. Was it totally laissez faire free market? No, but the alternative was not acceptable to the majority of US society, so what&#039;s the problem?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in