Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Bullion Investing
>
A naive question...
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="JrCoin, post: 1163848, member: 18390"]<b>seiginiorage</b></p><p><br /></p><p>Thank you for the State Quarter link, it was very helpful. I wasn't previously knowledgeable of the concept of seigniorage. Apparently neither is my computer, as it insists it is a spelling error! </p><p><br /></p><p>So as I understand it, because a precious metal tends to increase in value to fiat currency, it is a less desirable tool for tax revenue as opposed to clad fiat currency. </p><p><br /></p><p>This however does not change the fact that the United States does produce bullion products. It would seem that seigniorage must occur at some level with these products, particularly something like the new America the Beautiful series. </p><p><br /></p><p>Perhaps we may be seeing state level commemorative tokens aimed towards this goal as well. Personally I would be interested in such products, with the caveat that my collecting goals are primarily bullion based. While I'll regularly pay higher premiums for "true" collector coins like BU mercs and such, the newer programs need to be closer to spot. Since the silver and gold prices are so volatile, here is an idea:</p><p><br /></p><p>State based collector tokens minted in a sizable bronze or copper planchets. The price is more stable, and copper bullion does have a market where higher premiums are the norm. Does this sound like something you as a collector would support? I would, particularly if they served a higher educational program, like the H.I.P. pocket change program with Statehood quarters. With states like California and Michigan with serious debt problems, this could be a viable part of a larger solution. </p><p><br /></p><p>I like the idea of this as being more of a win/win situation between state and citizen than the lottery programs currently utilized. I'd prefer some intrinsic value over simple gambling when it comes to providing my state with extra revenue. </p><p><br /></p><p>Yes, the budget spending system is not set up to reward frugality. Perhaps if there was a plan for a viable alternative out there in the form of a bill or other legislation we could take the steps towards making the system better instead of just complaining about it. As commodity investors and numismatic enthusiasts we generally share a different outlook towards these issues than the average citizen. I know I don't have all the answers, but sometimes it's more important to ask the right questions.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="JrCoin, post: 1163848, member: 18390"][b]seiginiorage[/b] Thank you for the State Quarter link, it was very helpful. I wasn't previously knowledgeable of the concept of seigniorage. Apparently neither is my computer, as it insists it is a spelling error! So as I understand it, because a precious metal tends to increase in value to fiat currency, it is a less desirable tool for tax revenue as opposed to clad fiat currency. This however does not change the fact that the United States does produce bullion products. It would seem that seigniorage must occur at some level with these products, particularly something like the new America the Beautiful series. Perhaps we may be seeing state level commemorative tokens aimed towards this goal as well. Personally I would be interested in such products, with the caveat that my collecting goals are primarily bullion based. While I'll regularly pay higher premiums for "true" collector coins like BU mercs and such, the newer programs need to be closer to spot. Since the silver and gold prices are so volatile, here is an idea: State based collector tokens minted in a sizable bronze or copper planchets. The price is more stable, and copper bullion does have a market where higher premiums are the norm. Does this sound like something you as a collector would support? I would, particularly if they served a higher educational program, like the H.I.P. pocket change program with Statehood quarters. With states like California and Michigan with serious debt problems, this could be a viable part of a larger solution. I like the idea of this as being more of a win/win situation between state and citizen than the lottery programs currently utilized. I'd prefer some intrinsic value over simple gambling when it comes to providing my state with extra revenue. Yes, the budget spending system is not set up to reward frugality. Perhaps if there was a plan for a viable alternative out there in the form of a bill or other legislation we could take the steps towards making the system better instead of just complaining about it. As commodity investors and numismatic enthusiasts we generally share a different outlook towards these issues than the average citizen. I know I don't have all the answers, but sometimes it's more important to ask the right questions.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Bullion Investing
>
A naive question...
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...