Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;-jeffB, post: 1644410, member: 27832&quot;]For example: <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Now, <i>over time, starting now</i>, which asset is likely to yield better value -- one that&#039;s already been &quot;best performing&quot; (and therefore pumped up by additional investors) for the last ten years, or one that&#039;s been underperforming and neglected by investors during that same period?</p><p><br /></p><p>It&#039;s a non-trivial question, even if it&#039;s phrased rhetorically. Some investments are best-performing because they represent something with a consistent history of <i>generating</i> value or returns, sometimes over a period much longer than ten years. (I&#039;m looking at you, Procter &amp; Gamble.) And some are neglected by <i>wise</i> investors because they represent something mismanaged or ill-founded from the beginning.</p><p><br /></p><p>If it were simple, we wouldn&#039;t argue so much about it... <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in