Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Bullion Investing
>
$35+ an ounce! $50+ soon??
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="InfleXion, post: 1305162, member: 29012"]Please forgive me, but I have no confidence in the FDA. They allow pharmaceutical companies to provide their own trial results on drugs that they then turn around and allow people to use as 'safe' because they trust the company turning a profit to be honest. Not to mention that 6 months is an adequate amount of time for testing, so if it kills you after a year, they'll find out 6 months after it's released to the public. </p><p><br /></p><p>I am not talking about colloidal silver. I'm talking about nano-silver used in socks, counter tops, deoderant, pretty much anything anybody might want to be antibacterial. </p><p><br /></p><p>Also, producer dehedging is such a small amount of supply/demand it's almost not worth considering. Investment/Jewelry is a big one, but even those plus producer dehedging is still less than industrial demand: <a href="http://media.chrismartenson.com/images/silver-supply-demand-table.jpg" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://media.chrismartenson.com/images/silver-supply-demand-table.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://media.chrismartenson.com/images/silver-supply-demand-table.jpg</a> </p><p><br /></p><p>If demand for silver is based on speculation, why are above ground available physical supplies at the lowest level in over 700 years? The demand you are referring to is the paper market which I've already stated dominates the physical market by overwhelming factors and is not a true representation. The paper market can do anything and can't be used as a valid source for anything other than paper IMO. Maybe the paper denominated price is overvalued, but the physical price is far undervalued based on the physical market supply/demand dynamics. The fact that these 2 things are tied to each other is ludicrous. </p><p><br /></p><p>I agree that gold is over priced in terms of silver, but in my view both gold and silver are undervalued in terms of fiat currency. I am also toning down my expectations for silver in the short term, but not for the same reasons. Merely because the price is probably not going to break above $50 until the paper market no longer dominates the physical price. The CME has plenty of room to raise margin requirements, and they've shown that they will do so without hesitation.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="InfleXion, post: 1305162, member: 29012"]Please forgive me, but I have no confidence in the FDA. They allow pharmaceutical companies to provide their own trial results on drugs that they then turn around and allow people to use as 'safe' because they trust the company turning a profit to be honest. Not to mention that 6 months is an adequate amount of time for testing, so if it kills you after a year, they'll find out 6 months after it's released to the public. I am not talking about colloidal silver. I'm talking about nano-silver used in socks, counter tops, deoderant, pretty much anything anybody might want to be antibacterial. Also, producer dehedging is such a small amount of supply/demand it's almost not worth considering. Investment/Jewelry is a big one, but even those plus producer dehedging is still less than industrial demand: [url]http://media.chrismartenson.com/images/silver-supply-demand-table.jpg[/url] If demand for silver is based on speculation, why are above ground available physical supplies at the lowest level in over 700 years? The demand you are referring to is the paper market which I've already stated dominates the physical market by overwhelming factors and is not a true representation. The paper market can do anything and can't be used as a valid source for anything other than paper IMO. Maybe the paper denominated price is overvalued, but the physical price is far undervalued based on the physical market supply/demand dynamics. The fact that these 2 things are tied to each other is ludicrous. I agree that gold is over priced in terms of silver, but in my view both gold and silver are undervalued in terms of fiat currency. I am also toning down my expectations for silver in the short term, but not for the same reasons. Merely because the price is probably not going to break above $50 until the paper market no longer dominates the physical price. The CME has plenty of room to raise margin requirements, and they've shown that they will do so without hesitation.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Bullion Investing
>
$35+ an ounce! $50+ soon??
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...