Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;sio2ga, post: 2695865, member: 83570&quot;]I have bad eyesight and have to wear glasses to read, especially fine print, so if I can see this defect without glasses it for sure shouldn&#039;t be a 70.&nbsp; I think a 70 has to pass inspection at 5x magnification so it shouldn&#039;t be a 70 if someone with poor eyesight can see it.&nbsp; Somebody correct me if I am wrong.</p><p>What makes it so bad is that since the field is frosted this really stands out and if you tilt it just right it is every bit as shiny as the springbok!&nbsp; It wouldn&#039;t bother me so bad if it was on the back but it&#039;s right in front.</p><p>I emailed MCM to see about exchanging it.&nbsp; It was hard to be civil.&nbsp; I initially typed out, &quot;can I exchange this for one that is not damaged, or at least damaged in the back instead of the front?&quot; but then thought better of it and deleted the snark before sending.&nbsp;&nbsp; Still, this makes me mad and it was not cheap either.&nbsp; You&#039;d think MCM would inspect the coins themselves before sending.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in