Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;AlexN2coins2004, post: 1060150, member: 19049&quot;]my opinion is simply that there should have been an initial investment into creating NASA and then the technology advancements they made would be there&#039;s and they could and would sell them to other companies.&nbsp; The profit that they would make would go back into making more technology advancements and paying back the start up money. Of course at a 12:1 ratio I would think eventually recycling the money would bring the income to NASA to trillions of dollars and would be an easy way to pay for the national budget without actually having to borrow from China or other countries...just my opinion though... Look at all the companies and people that have become extremely rich from NASA without them actually having to do 1/10 of the work that NASA did for them to make their fortunes. </p><p><br /></p><p>so why are we stopping NASA? I guess it&#039;s broke or perceived to be broken and as politicians think &quot;if it&#039;s not broken then fix it&quot;[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in