Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Zumbly's 10 Favorites of 2019
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="zumbly, post: 3949168, member: 57495"]Awww, thanks for saying all that. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie80" alt=":shame:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> Of course, I feel exactly the same way. I would absolutely have hated you a bit too. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie7" alt=":p" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>Same here! I also enjoyed the writeup the NAC catalogue had on the collector. It didn't reveal his name, but it was personal, effusive, and informative. Apparently, apart from being from a royal family, having great taste and lots of money, he also had a photographic memory and was just a really nice guy. Probably handsome, too. Some people have all the luck... and all the coins. Nope, not grumbling at all. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie88" alt=":sour:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie8" alt=":D" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Indeed he was! And maybe, someday, ifi you ever get tired of any of your fantastic coins, you'll remember your friend Z, and my ex Pozzi will be joined by a couple more coins with another fine French pedigree. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>The auction house didn't note the possibility, but I did think that might have been the case when I first received the coin in hand. I can't think of any other explanation, though I've seen other coins with similar surfaces being passed off as regular issues. I'm waiting to receive the Boutin catalogue where this coin appears to see if it was listed as plated there. </p><p><br /></p><p>Interesting question I've never asked myself! I'm going to have to look at more bow strings on coins.</p><p><br /></p><p>Was it slightly bashed/chipped/broken so that the damage showed on just one side? I'm not sure.</p><p><br /></p><p>Both Valens and his brother Valentinian were known to have been fairly tolerant of pagan worship. The issues with the emperors' portraits began from the time of Diocletian, and were produced at Rome in small quantities every year for every ruler until Valentinian II. Module size of the issues varied, and if my recall of Alfoldi is correct, matched with contemporary issues. The reverse legend VOTA PVBLICA was used for all the Festival types and suggests these were official product, used either for the Jan 3 public vows or the Mar 5 Isis Festival. The use of the emperor's portrait on Festival issues stop with the anti-pagan programs of Theodosius I, and Alfoldi suggests that it is from this date (379/380) that the anonymous Isis/Serapis types were introduced.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="zumbly, post: 3949168, member: 57495"]Awww, thanks for saying all that. :shame: Of course, I feel exactly the same way. I would absolutely have hated you a bit too. :p Same here! I also enjoyed the writeup the NAC catalogue had on the collector. It didn't reveal his name, but it was personal, effusive, and informative. Apparently, apart from being from a royal family, having great taste and lots of money, he also had a photographic memory and was just a really nice guy. Probably handsome, too. Some people have all the luck... and all the coins. Nope, not grumbling at all. :sour::D Indeed he was! And maybe, someday, ifi you ever get tired of any of your fantastic coins, you'll remember your friend Z, and my ex Pozzi will be joined by a couple more coins with another fine French pedigree. :) The auction house didn't note the possibility, but I did think that might have been the case when I first received the coin in hand. I can't think of any other explanation, though I've seen other coins with similar surfaces being passed off as regular issues. I'm waiting to receive the Boutin catalogue where this coin appears to see if it was listed as plated there. Interesting question I've never asked myself! I'm going to have to look at more bow strings on coins. Was it slightly bashed/chipped/broken so that the damage showed on just one side? I'm not sure. Both Valens and his brother Valentinian were known to have been fairly tolerant of pagan worship. The issues with the emperors' portraits began from the time of Diocletian, and were produced at Rome in small quantities every year for every ruler until Valentinian II. Module size of the issues varied, and if my recall of Alfoldi is correct, matched with contemporary issues. The reverse legend VOTA PVBLICA was used for all the Festival types and suggests these were official product, used either for the Jan 3 public vows or the Mar 5 Isis Festival. The use of the emperor's portrait on Festival issues stop with the anti-pagan programs of Theodosius I, and Alfoldi suggests that it is from this date (379/380) that the anonymous Isis/Serapis types were introduced.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Zumbly's 10 Favorites of 2019
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...