Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Clawcoins, post: 4295793, member: 77814&quot;]Of course, don&#039;t take anything seriously up above.&nbsp; Nothing is an error, the misfit pile is all junk and the 1969 inverted 9 is well, a 1966 after all.&nbsp; I&#039;ll just sit back and wait for that Anonymous Idiot button counter now to flash on my post.</p><p><br /></p><p>A few ending merandering thoughts</p><ul> <li>Any damaged zincoln, whether visual or not, may weigh less than specifications, due to:</li> <li>any zinc loss - white powder</li> <li>going through any washer/dryer process that may lead to zinc loss</li> <li>or any other chemical that may leech into the zincoln and cause zinc loss, thus weight loss</li> </ul><p>So it should really not be &quot;rare&quot; for a zincoln to weigh less than specifications.</p><p><br /></p><p>Which gets me to my 1.558g zincoln.</p><p><br /></p><p>And I plan on showing how to make coins that show &quot;grease fill dies&quot; on cents that are artificial created, and really large and weird lamination peels.&nbsp; Sooner or Later.</p><p><br /></p><p>Let the roll search begin on those sub 2.5g zincolns errors …[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in