Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Your rarest emperor
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="IdesOfMarch01, post: 2246440, member: 39084"]It's not clear to me what the definition of "rarest emperor" should be. For example, does it mean the emperor who actually issued the fewest coins? Or the emperor for whom the fewest coins exist today? Or maybe the emperor who ruled the shortest period, since his coins would have been superseded very quickly by the next emperor?</p><p><br /></p><p>Or could it mean a specific coin that's rare, even if large numbers of coins were struck under that emperor?</p><p><br /></p><p>Case in point: my avatar coin, an aureus of Caligula, is listed as "of the highest rarity" with only two known specimens:</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]443832[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>GAIUS (CALIGULA)</p><p>AV Aureus (7.66 g.) Lugdunum ca. 37 - 38 A.D. </p><p>C CAESAR AVG GERM P M TR POT Laureate head r. Rev. S P Q R / P P / OB C S within oak wreath.</p><p>From the Biaggi collection.</p><p><br /></p><p>This coin isn't listed in RIC I, but I personally consider its "rarity" to be somewhat artificial since the scarceness is based on the obverse legend. A similar aureus, RIC 27, has a slightly different obverse legend (C CAESAR AVG PON M TR POT III COS III) and is more plentiful (listed as R3, with up to 10 specimens known -- not actually that plentiful).</p><p><br /></p><p>So I'd be interested in hearing other opinions about the definition of "rarest emperor."[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="IdesOfMarch01, post: 2246440, member: 39084"]It's not clear to me what the definition of "rarest emperor" should be. For example, does it mean the emperor who actually issued the fewest coins? Or the emperor for whom the fewest coins exist today? Or maybe the emperor who ruled the shortest period, since his coins would have been superseded very quickly by the next emperor? Or could it mean a specific coin that's rare, even if large numbers of coins were struck under that emperor? Case in point: my avatar coin, an aureus of Caligula, is listed as "of the highest rarity" with only two known specimens: [ATTACH=full]443832[/ATTACH] GAIUS (CALIGULA) AV Aureus (7.66 g.) Lugdunum ca. 37 - 38 A.D. C CAESAR AVG GERM P M TR POT Laureate head r. Rev. S P Q R / P P / OB C S within oak wreath. From the Biaggi collection. This coin isn't listed in RIC I, but I personally consider its "rarity" to be somewhat artificial since the scarceness is based on the obverse legend. A similar aureus, RIC 27, has a slightly different obverse legend (C CAESAR AVG PON M TR POT III COS III) and is more plentiful (listed as R3, with up to 10 specimens known -- not actually that plentiful). So I'd be interested in hearing other opinions about the definition of "rarest emperor."[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Your rarest emperor
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...