Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Your Opinion Please--Is This Kennedy Overgraded?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="John Anthony, post: 1918211, member: 42773"]I've collected a handful of 1964 Kennedy half dollars slabbed by PCGS in various grades, and I think PCGS got the OP coin right. Coins graded 63 to 64 are literally sprinkled with contact marks. There's no way that coin grades that low. It's at least a 65 because of the very small number of contact marks, compared to other coins of that year.</p><p><br /></p><p>It also has a nice strong strike. The detail on the bust is quite sharp in the hair, the ear, and the facial features. One place the strike can be very weak on these coins is the shield area on the reverse. Often the top edge of the shield is altogether missing, and the eagle's neck feathers are indistinct. The shield itself is often covered with contact marks. The OP coin shows full detail in this area with no marks at all.</p><p><br /></p><p>It's difficult to capture luster in a photograph, but I suspect that it also has above-average luster because of the strong strike, and that would easily put it at 66, whether it was toned or not.</p><p><br /></p><p>I saw quite a few discrepancies in PCGS's grading of these coins, but I believe this one is graded correctly.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="John Anthony, post: 1918211, member: 42773"]I've collected a handful of 1964 Kennedy half dollars slabbed by PCGS in various grades, and I think PCGS got the OP coin right. Coins graded 63 to 64 are literally sprinkled with contact marks. There's no way that coin grades that low. It's at least a 65 because of the very small number of contact marks, compared to other coins of that year. It also has a nice strong strike. The detail on the bust is quite sharp in the hair, the ear, and the facial features. One place the strike can be very weak on these coins is the shield area on the reverse. Often the top edge of the shield is altogether missing, and the eagle's neck feathers are indistinct. The shield itself is often covered with contact marks. The OP coin shows full detail in this area with no marks at all. It's difficult to capture luster in a photograph, but I suspect that it also has above-average luster because of the strong strike, and that would easily put it at 66, whether it was toned or not. I saw quite a few discrepancies in PCGS's grading of these coins, but I believe this one is graded correctly.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Your Opinion Please--Is This Kennedy Overgraded?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...