Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
your opinion on two ancient coins
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2972476, member: 19463"]Condition is everything on coins and this is a fine example of that fact. The Justinian example posted by Marsyas Mike is, IMHO, worth 2 - 4 times as much as the first one but opinions on such matters are wide and varied so you might find someone with the opposite view. Mine is different, not necessarily better depending on what parts mean the most to you. Such is the case with most Byzantine bronzes. Perfection is hard to find and faults are hard to compare. </p><p>[ATTACH=full]729465[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>Again IMHO, the Caligula has no value unless you want to test the theories offered on whether the coin has bronze disease and whether you can arrest its progression to a pile of powder. BD or not, the coin will never be better looking than it is now. the pits are far past the surfaces so cleaning them will make them less blue but not less ugly. The coin below is a survivor of BD and shows what remains of what was a relatively well detailed coin before it was 'infected'. Cleaning only reveals detail that exists but can not restore parts that have been removed by 'coin cancer'. Is TIF right or gsimonel with the diagnosis? IDK but it makes no practical difference at this point. </p><p>[ATTACH=full]729463[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2972476, member: 19463"]Condition is everything on coins and this is a fine example of that fact. The Justinian example posted by Marsyas Mike is, IMHO, worth 2 - 4 times as much as the first one but opinions on such matters are wide and varied so you might find someone with the opposite view. Mine is different, not necessarily better depending on what parts mean the most to you. Such is the case with most Byzantine bronzes. Perfection is hard to find and faults are hard to compare. [ATTACH=full]729465[/ATTACH] Again IMHO, the Caligula has no value unless you want to test the theories offered on whether the coin has bronze disease and whether you can arrest its progression to a pile of powder. BD or not, the coin will never be better looking than it is now. the pits are far past the surfaces so cleaning them will make them less blue but not less ugly. The coin below is a survivor of BD and shows what remains of what was a relatively well detailed coin before it was 'infected'. Cleaning only reveals detail that exists but can not restore parts that have been removed by 'coin cancer'. Is TIF right or gsimonel with the diagnosis? IDK but it makes no practical difference at this point. [ATTACH=full]729463[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
your opinion on two ancient coins
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...