Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Your opinion on RRC millenium I by Sear ?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="DonnaML, post: 4169123, member: 110350"]For looking up Republican silver coins, I find Vol. I of Sear's Roman Silver Coins infinitely more useful as a practical matter than Vol. I of Sear's Roman Coins and their Values (Millennium Edition). The simple reason is that the Republican coins in RCV are arranged chronologically, whereas the coins in RSC are arranged in the traditional way, by moneyer. (RSC takes its numbering system from the old Cohen catalog.) It's awfully hard to look up an undated coin in a chronological catalog if you don't already know at least the approximate year of issue. It's a lot easier to find when the coins are arranged by moneyer, given that (except for the early anonymous issues) the moneyer's name (in some form) is on each coin. Plus, that's still the way most dealers index their Republican coins, as do V-coins and Ma-Shops.</p><p><br /></p><p>Nonetheless, I have both, because once you identify a coin, RCV has more, and more up to date, information. As others have pointed out, the values in both -- especially RSC -- are out of date. And Crawford has more information than both of them. By the way, there are free downloads available on the Internet of both volumes of Crawford; the only thing missing from the downloads is the plates in Volume II. But there are other places to find images of Republican coins.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="DonnaML, post: 4169123, member: 110350"]For looking up Republican silver coins, I find Vol. I of Sear's Roman Silver Coins infinitely more useful as a practical matter than Vol. I of Sear's Roman Coins and their Values (Millennium Edition). The simple reason is that the Republican coins in RCV are arranged chronologically, whereas the coins in RSC are arranged in the traditional way, by moneyer. (RSC takes its numbering system from the old Cohen catalog.) It's awfully hard to look up an undated coin in a chronological catalog if you don't already know at least the approximate year of issue. It's a lot easier to find when the coins are arranged by moneyer, given that (except for the early anonymous issues) the moneyer's name (in some form) is on each coin. Plus, that's still the way most dealers index their Republican coins, as do V-coins and Ma-Shops. Nonetheless, I have both, because once you identify a coin, RCV has more, and more up to date, information. As others have pointed out, the values in both -- especially RSC -- are out of date. And Crawford has more information than both of them. By the way, there are free downloads available on the Internet of both volumes of Crawford; the only thing missing from the downloads is the plates in Volume II. But there are other places to find images of Republican coins.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Your opinion on RRC millenium I by Sear ?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...