Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;GDJMSP, post: 1432603, member: 112&quot;]I&#039;m gonna guess they called it 66. I&#039;m kind of torn on the FBL though. PCGS is often lenient with FBL, but I&#039;m guessing on this one they did not give it.</p><p><br /></p><p>Me, I&#039;d grade it a 64. The coin is not as clean as it looks at first glance. There are at least 8, what I would call, medium contact marks on the obv along with several small ones. Thereis also a small scratch. The rev is cleaner with only 2 medium marks and a few small ones. But because of the toning most of the marks do not readily stand out. I find the toning unattractive and the coin lacking in eye appeal. </p><p><br /></p><p>The obv also looks like it might have been wiped early in its life and later toned over.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in