Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Yet another Probus
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Orielensis, post: 4225483, member: 96898"]That indeed sounds like a good lot! When I was starting to collect, I bought some uncleaned lots, too. Almost all of the coins I got were worse than the ones you showed and in a condition I would not collect today. Though I thus wouldn't recommend building a collection exclusively by searching through uncleaned lots, I still reckon that cleaning and identifying about 150 3rd and 4th century bronzes in different states of corrosion gave me some numismatic education that was worth a lot more than what I had paid for the coins.</p><p><br /></p><p>Only a few of these coins are still in my collection, the rest of them had to make space for better examples at some point. Among those that stayed is a Valerian with the same reverse as your Gallienus, including the "T"-fieldmark:</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1081376[/ATTACH]</p><p><font size="3">Valerian I, Roman Empire, AE/BI antoninian, 256–257 AD, Rome mint. Obv: IMP C P LIC VAL[ERIANVS P F] AVG; bust of Valerian, radiate, draped, cuirassed, r. Rev: [P]AX AVG[G]; Pax standing l.. holding olive-branch and sceptre; in l. field, T. 20mm, 2.09g. Ref: RIC V Valerian 109var (fieldmark).</font></p><p><font size="3"><br /></font></p><p><font size="3"><font size="4">Here are some more remnants from these early days of my collecting - most of the uncleaned coins I got were in much lower condition, though:</font></font></p><p><font size="3"><font size="4">[ATTACH=full]1081374[/ATTACH] </font></font></p><p><font size="3">Constantine I, Roman Empire, AE 3, 335–336 AD, Siscia mint. Obv: CONSTANTINVS MAX AVG, bust of Constantine I, diademed, draped and cuirassed, r. Rev: GLORIA EXERCITUS; two soldiers standing facing each other, standard between them. 15mm, 1.45g. Ref: RIC VII Siscia 261.</font></p><p><font size="3"><br /></font></p><p><font size="3">[ATTACH=full]1081375[/ATTACH] </font></p><p><font size="3">Constantine I, Roman Empire, AE3, 327–329 AD, Heraclea mint. Obv: CONSTANTINVS AVG; head of Constantine, diademed, r., looking upward. Rev: D N CONSTANTINI MAX AVG; “VOT/XXX” within a laurel wreath. 19mm, 3.20g. Ref: RIC VII Heraclea 92.</font></p><p><font size="3"><br /></font></p><p><font size="3">[ATTACH=full]1081373[/ATTACH] </font></p><p><font size="3"><font size="4"><font size="3">Constantius II, Roman Empire, AE3, 351–355 AD, Sirmium mint. Obv: D N CONSTANTIVS P F AVG; bust of Constantius II, pearl-diademed, draped, cuirassed, r. Rev: FEL TEMP REPARATIO; Helmeted soldier to l., shield on l.arm, spearing falling horseman; shield on ground at r. Horseman is bareheaded, turns to face soldier, and extends l. arm; in exergue, BSIRM. 18mm, 2.76g. RIC VIII Sirmium 48.</font></font></font>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Orielensis, post: 4225483, member: 96898"]That indeed sounds like a good lot! When I was starting to collect, I bought some uncleaned lots, too. Almost all of the coins I got were worse than the ones you showed and in a condition I would not collect today. Though I thus wouldn't recommend building a collection exclusively by searching through uncleaned lots, I still reckon that cleaning and identifying about 150 3rd and 4th century bronzes in different states of corrosion gave me some numismatic education that was worth a lot more than what I had paid for the coins. Only a few of these coins are still in my collection, the rest of them had to make space for better examples at some point. Among those that stayed is a Valerian with the same reverse as your Gallienus, including the "T"-fieldmark: [ATTACH=full]1081376[/ATTACH] [SIZE=3]Valerian I, Roman Empire, AE/BI antoninian, 256–257 AD, Rome mint. Obv: IMP C P LIC VAL[ERIANVS P F] AVG; bust of Valerian, radiate, draped, cuirassed, r. Rev: [P]AX AVG[G]; Pax standing l.. holding olive-branch and sceptre; in l. field, T. 20mm, 2.09g. Ref: RIC V Valerian 109var (fieldmark). [SIZE=4]Here are some more remnants from these early days of my collecting - most of the uncleaned coins I got were in much lower condition, though:[/SIZE][/SIZE] [SIZE=3][SIZE=4][ATTACH=full]1081374[/ATTACH] [/SIZE][/SIZE] [SIZE=3]Constantine I, Roman Empire, AE 3, 335–336 AD, Siscia mint. Obv: CONSTANTINVS MAX AVG, bust of Constantine I, diademed, draped and cuirassed, r. Rev: GLORIA EXERCITUS; two soldiers standing facing each other, standard between them. 15mm, 1.45g. Ref: RIC VII Siscia 261. [ATTACH=full]1081375[/ATTACH] Constantine I, Roman Empire, AE3, 327–329 AD, Heraclea mint. Obv: CONSTANTINVS AVG; head of Constantine, diademed, r., looking upward. Rev: D N CONSTANTINI MAX AVG; “VOT/XXX” within a laurel wreath. 19mm, 3.20g. Ref: RIC VII Heraclea 92. [ATTACH=full]1081373[/ATTACH] [SIZE=4][SIZE=3]Constantius II, Roman Empire, AE3, 351–355 AD, Sirmium mint. Obv: D N CONSTANTIVS P F AVG; bust of Constantius II, pearl-diademed, draped, cuirassed, r. Rev: FEL TEMP REPARATIO; Helmeted soldier to l., shield on l.arm, spearing falling horseman; shield on ground at r. Horseman is bareheaded, turns to face soldier, and extends l. arm; in exergue, BSIRM. 18mm, 2.76g. RIC VIII Sirmium 48.[/SIZE][/SIZE][/SIZE][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Yet another Probus
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...