Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;No_Ragrets, post: 26428338, member: 151874&quot;]All of those are very nice! And I&#039;m definitely a fan of the animated pics, I&#039;m just not quite there yet with my photography so I just did the video upload. </p><p><br /></p><p>I think by appearance, mine most closely resembles your 1909. But the way the light moves across it is more like the 1879. There&#039;s definitely some highly reflective areas that simply shoot the light right back at the eye, while other areas seem to be muted from the toning. Even those spots still reflect though, just not as brightly. </p><p><br /></p><p>I took some more pictures of this one next to my other IHC&#039;s in my 7070 and this one is <i>by</i> <i>far </i>superior in the level of detail. It&#039;s even got small hints of a cameo effect at the right angle. I don&#039;t know, I&#039;m kind of torn. I absolutely want to say this is a proof but I&#039;m just not quite certain about it. How else would it have mirrored fields and between the devices? </p><p><br /></p><p>But back to yours... I would think those could all easily be proofs. Strongest mirrors in order for yours looks to be &#039;03, &#039;79, &#039;09, &#039;93, &#039;91, then &#039;90. But great detail on each one of those. [ATTACH=full]1686038[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1686039[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1686040[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1686041[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1686042[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in